public-webapps-github@w3.org from July 2026 by author

Addison Phillips

• [w3c/manifest] "cannot be used together" editing woes (Issue #1227) (Thursday, 9 July)

Alexander Kyereboah

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add `application-context` CSS media feature (PR #1218) (Tuesday, 7 July)

Andrew Sutherland

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should a service worker be allowed to register new service workers? (#1117) (Friday, 3 July)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Element.matches and pseudo-elements (#185) (Tuesday, 14 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Element.matches and pseudo-elements (#185) (Tuesday, 14 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Define a mapping to a Selectors Element Tree (#542) (Tuesday, 14 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Can a URL have a segmented path with zero segments? (Issue #926) (Tuesday, 14 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Can a URL have a segmented path with zero segments? (Issue #926) (Monday, 13 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Can a URL have a segmented path with zero segments? (Issue #926) (Monday, 13 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Can a URL have a segmented path with zero segments? (Issue #926) (Monday, 13 July)
• [whatwg/dom] Factor out find a named element and rename a collection's nodes (PR #1493) (Sunday, 12 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Define a mapping to a Selectors Element Tree (#542) (Sunday, 12 July)
• [whatwg/dom] Copy a document's base URL when cloning (PR #1492) (Saturday, 11 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] `event.target` not cleared if event is not fired on `ShadowRoot` (Issue #1072) (Saturday, 11 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] `event.target` not cleared if event is not fired on `ShadowRoot` (Issue #1072) (Saturday, 11 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Define the realm of nodes (#977) (Friday, 10 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Define the realm of nodes (#977) (Friday, 10 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Create nodes in the realm of the document they are created for (PR #1491) (Friday, 10 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Create nodes in the realm of the document they are created for (PR #1491) (Friday, 10 July)
• [whatwg/dom] Create nodes in the realm of the document they are created for (PR #1491) (Friday, 10 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Adopting children of an intentional null shadow root goes wrong (Issue #1429) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Update element adoption logic for scoped registry (PR #1437) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] replaceChildren can not replace a Document's documentElement (Issue #1045) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Let replaceChildren() replace a document's children (PR #1487) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] What does adoptNode() return for DocumentFragment? (#813) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Adopt a DocumentFragment with a host like any other node (PR #1486) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [whatwg/webidl] Is a function signature with a parameter type `(DOMString or Interface)` a footgun? (Issue #1604) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: type arguments in event dispatch algorithms (PR #1490) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Rename document (Issue #478) (Thursday, 9 July)
• [whatwg/dom] Editorial: type arguments in event dispatch algorithms (PR #1490) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Set event’s target to the target of the last tuple in event’s path, that is either tuple or preceding tuple, whose target is non-null. (#707) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: name event path items and clarify target selection (PR #1489) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Rename document (Issue #478) (Thursday, 9 July)
• [whatwg/dom] Editorial: name event path items and clarify target selection (PR #1489) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Element.matches and pseudo-elements (#185) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] replaceChild() has odd mutation observer behavior after #754 (#814) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Adopt node before removing child in replace (PR #1488) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Adopt node before removing child in replace (PR #1488) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• [whatwg/dom] Adopt node before removing child in replace (PR #1488) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Let replaceChildren() replace a document's children (PR #1487) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• [whatwg/dom] Let replaceChildren() replace a document's children (PR #1487) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Trouble understanding a parable of specification, under the "ensure pre-insertion validity" list of steps (#870) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: improve ensure pre-insert validity (PR #1484) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: improve ensure pre-insert validity (PR #1484) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• [whatwg/dom] Adopt a DocumentFragment with a host like any other node (PR #1486) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Adoption and DocumentFragment, part two (#819) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Adoption and DocumentFragment, part two (#819) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] [Proposal] Add EventTarget.getEventListeners() (#412) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] [Proposal] Add EventTarget.getEventListeners() (#412) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Define "has event listener" operation (#453) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Improving "find slottables" (Issue #1063) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Improving "find slottables" (Issue #1063) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "then increase hiddenSubtreeLevel by " (#564) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "then increase hiddenSubtreeLevel by " (#564) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "then increase hiddenSubtreeLevel by " (#564) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Which target could we expose in Event Timing? (#838) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Increase the ability to query whether the host environment supports a specific event (#968) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Increase the ability to query whether the host environment supports a specific event (#968) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] replaceChildren can not replace a Document's documentElement (Issue #1045) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• [whatwg/dom] Clarify create an element assertion (PR #1485) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: Allow WebIDL bindings to expose method parameters' types (Issue #1182) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: A new way to do feature detection for members (Issue #1181) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: Allow WebIDL binding to expose parameters' types and enums' values (Issue #1183) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Variable strength aborting (Issue #1215) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Variable strength aborting (Issue #1215) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Make it possible to wrap [parts of] the contents of a <textarea> or <input> in a Range (Issue #1375) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: improve ensure pre-insert validity (PR #1484) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• [whatwg/dom] Editorial: improve ensure pre-insert validity (PR #1484) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Please add the links to the old versions? (Issue #1067) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Blame stopped working (Issue #1367) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Blame stopped working (Issue #1367) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Ranges and Attr nodes (#607) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Expose document fragment serialization algorithm (#965) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Expose document fragment serialization algorithm (#965) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Strange behavior with `insertBefore` vs `appendChild` and transitions (#880) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Strange behavior with `insertBefore` vs `appendChild` and transitions (#880) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Element.replaceChild should allow for `old, new` argument ordering if `new` is a new element and `old` is a child of Element (#847) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Element.replaceChild should allow for `old, new` argument ordering if `new` is a new element and `old` is a child of Element (#847) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] classes are compared without Unicode normalization (#793) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] classes are compared without Unicode normalization (#793) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Why is `createProcessingInstruction(…)` allowed in HTML, but `createCDATASection(…)` isn’t? (#798) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Why is `createProcessingInstruction(…)` allowed in HTML, but `createCDATASection(…)` isn’t? (#798) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Address feedback from Travis and Sangwhan (#702) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: address assorted feedback (PR #1483) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• [whatwg/dom] Editorial: address assorted feedback (PR #1483) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Refactor toggle attribute (#663) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Refactor toggle attribute (#663) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Abstract common logic in toggleAttribute() and setAttribute()? (#657) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Abstract common logic in toggleAttribute() and setAttribute()? (#657) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "To validate and extract a namespace and qualifiedName" could use clarification about case-insensitivity (#680) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "To validate and extract a namespace and qualifiedName" could use clarification about case-insensitivity (#680) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Allow <menu>, <ul>, <ol>, <li> to attach shadow (#676) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Allow <menu>, <ul>, <ol>, <li> to attach shadow (#676) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Make "inner invoke" use "remove an event listener" (#758) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Make "inner invoke" use "remove an event listener" (#758) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Make "inner invoke" use "remove an event listener" (#651) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Make "inner invoke" use "remove an event listener" (#651) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] document.open()'s mutation event suppression (#640) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: consider linking "present" consistently (#574) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: remove remaining dictionary "is present" usage (PR #1482) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• [whatwg/dom] Editorial: remove remaining dictionary "is present" usage (PR #1482) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node Tree section should probably include Attr (#457) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node Tree section should probably include Attr (#457) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Ranges and Attr nodes (#607) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Use `commonAncestorContainer` in concept-range-clone (#56) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: abstract getting the common ancestor (PR #1481) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: abstract getting the common ancestor (PR #1481) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• [whatwg/dom] Editorial: abstract getting the common ancestor (PR #1481) (Tuesday, 7 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Restore deep cloning of shadow root contents. (PR #1480) (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Restore deep cloning of shadow root contents. (PR #1480) (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Report a validation error for IPv4 addresses from non-ASCII input (PR #925) (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Can a URL have a segmented path with zero segments? (Issue #926) (Saturday, 4 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Update element adoption logic for scoped registry (PR #1437) (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: make adopt traverse the tree less (PR #1427) (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove mentions of XSLT from the DOM spec (PR #1400) (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Handle NodeIterator node removal during filtering (PR #1479) (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: [whatwg/webidl] Update PropertyDescriptor [[Get]]/[[Set]] to [[Getter]]/[[Setter]] (PR #1613) (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: [whatwg/webidl] Update PropertyDescriptor [[Get]]/[[Set]] to [[Getter]]/[[Setter]] (PR #1613) (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Handle NodeIterator node removal during filtering (PR #1479) (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Handle NodeIterator node removal during filtering (PR #1479) (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Anchor permanence for https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#methods (Issue #1932) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Anchor permanence for https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#methods (Issue #1932) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Meta: make methods a required ID (PR #1939) (Thursday, 2 July)
• [whatwg/fetch] Meta: make methods a required ID (PR #1939) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Redesign of "extract header list values" expected (#1360) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove "allow declarative shadow roots" (PR #1478) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Meta: UTS46 feedback (Issue #744) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Meta: UTS46 feedback (Issue #744) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove "allow declarative shadow roots" (PR #1478) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add and export get an element by ID (PR #1476) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Fix NodeIterator pre-remove steps for ancestors of root (PR #1477) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Handle NodeIterator node removal during filtering (PR #1479) (Thursday, 2 July)
• [whatwg/dom] Handle NodeIterator node removal during filtering (PR #1479) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Fix NodeIterator pre-remove steps for ancestors of root (PR #1477) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] NodeIterator's pre-removing steps does not match browsers (#907) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Fix NodeIterator pre-remove steps for ancestors of root (PR #1477) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Enumerate differences with URI & IRI in an appendix (PR #923) (Thursday, 2 July)
• [whatwg/url] Report a validation error for IPv4 addresses from non-ASCII input (PR #925) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Close more gaps between URL writing and parser sections (PR #924) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Close more gaps between URL writing and parser sections (PR #924) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] It is unlikely that the spec's two definitions of valid URL strings are equal (Issue #704) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• [whatwg/url] Close more gaps between URL writing and parser sections (PR #924) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Enumerate differences with URI & IRI in an appendix (PR #923) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• [whatwg/url] Enumerate differences with URI & IRI in an appendix (PR #923) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrating the HTTP QUERY method (RFC 10008): method normalization, CORS, and caching (Issue #1938) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Define valid IPv6-address string inline (PR #917) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] RFC 4291 is not really sufficient to define "valid IPv6-address string" (Issue #916) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Define valid IPv6-address string inline (PR #917) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Valid domain needs to account for ending with a number (PR #918) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Valid domain needs to account for ending with a number (PR #918) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Make relative-URL-with-fragment string account for opaque-path base URLs (PR #920) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Path segments can be empty (PR #919) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] What is an opaque path? (Issue #922) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] A branch of the "ends in a number checker" cannot be hit (Issue #865) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Simplify ends in a number checker (PR #921) (Wednesday, 1 July)

anonghuser

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create service worker from Blob/String URL (#578) (Saturday, 11 July)

antstar28-ui

• [whatwg/url] Ab (Issue #927) (Friday, 10 July)

Ben Francis

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add `application-context` CSS media feature (PR #1218) (Thursday, 2 July)

carlaarchuleta707-lgtm

• Re: [whatwg/webidl] Intent to use Constants (Issue #1618) (Monday, 13 July)
• [whatwg/webidl] Intent to use Constants (Issue #1618) (Monday, 13 July)

Christian Liebel

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Other Spec Review: HTML menu elements (Issue #1242) (Friday, 10 July)
• [w3c/manifest] [DRAFT] Check against i18n Review Checklist (Issue #1223) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Redefine application context on top-level traversable (PR #1219) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] chore: update SchemaStore URLs to www.schemastore.org (PR #1220) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] chore: update SchemaStore URLs to www.schemastore.org (PR #1220) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] chore: update SchemaStore URLs to www.schemastore.org (PR #1220) (Thursday, 2 July)
• [w3c/manifest] chore: update SchemaStore URLs to www.schemastore.org (PR #1220) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Redefine application context on top-level traversable (PR #1219) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add `color_scheme_dark` member and themeable members (PR #1205) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Other Spec Review: CRA web browser standard (Issue #1239) (Wednesday, 1 July)

Dan Clark

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Other Spec Review: `textStream()` for `Blob` and `Body` (Issue #1236) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Other Spec Review: `textStream()` for `Blob` and `Body` (Issue #1236) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Other Spec Review: `textStream()` for `Blob` and `Body` (Issue #1236) (Tuesday, 7 July)

Daniel Murphy

• Re: [w3c/manifest] chore: fix SchemaStore links and drop the embedded schema view (PR #1220) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Redefine application context on top-level traversable (PR #1219) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add `application-context` CSS media feature (PR #1218) (Thursday, 2 July)

dillonstreator

• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Option to specify ClipboardItem is sensitive in .write() and .writeText() (#154) (Sunday, 5 July)

Domenic Denicola

• Re: [whatwg/url] Report a validation error for IPv4 addresses from non-ASCII input (PR #925) (Sunday, 5 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] It is unlikely that the spec's two definitions of valid URL strings are equal (Issue #704) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Close more gaps between URL writing and parser sections (PR #924) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Enumerate differences with URI & IRI in an appendix (PR #923) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] It is unlikely that the spec's two definitions of valid URL strings are equal (Issue #704) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Define valid IPv6-address string inline (PR #917) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Valid domain needs to account for ending with a number (PR #918) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Valid domain needs to account for ending with a number (PR #918) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Make relative-URL-with-fragment string account for opaque-path base URLs (PR #920) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Path segments can be empty (PR #919) (Wednesday, 1 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Simplify ends in a number checker (PR #921) (Wednesday, 1 July)

Dominic Farolino

• [w3c/manifest] Manifest name: USVString or not? (Issue #1228) (Tuesday, 14 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Adopt node before removing child in replace (PR #1488) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Other Spec Review: HTML menu elements (Issue #1242) (Wednesday, 1 July)

dwaltersbal-mlg

• [w3c/manifest] Create SECURITY.md (PR #1226) (Monday, 6 July)

Ehsan Toreini

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Incubation: Connection Allowlists (Issue #1173) (Friday, 3 July)

Frédéric Wang Nélar

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add support for compression dictionary transport (PR #1854) (Friday, 10 July)

github-actions[bot]

• [w3c/manifest] Tidied up document using tidy-html5 (PR #1222) (Thursday, 2 July)

Greg Gibson

• Re: [WICG/webcomponents] Reference Target "phase 2": seeking feedback and use cases (Issue #1111) (Thursday, 2 July)

Gregory Terzian

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Editorial: Queue a task to resolve/reject promise or when fire an event. (PR #1755) (Sunday, 12 July)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] cache and cache-storage algos forgets to queue a task to resolve promise. (Issue #1831) (Thursday, 9 July)

Hamza Ironside

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request with GET/HEAD method cannot have body. (#551) (Friday, 3 July)

J. King

• Re: [whatwg/url] What is an opaque path? (Issue #922) (Thursday, 2 July)

James C. Wise

• Re: [whatwg/url] Can a URL have a segmented path with zero segments? (Issue #926) (Tuesday, 14 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Can a URL have a segmented path with zero segments? (Issue #926) (Tuesday, 14 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Can a URL have a segmented path with zero segments? (Issue #926) (Tuesday, 14 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Can a URL have a segmented path with zero segments? (Issue #926) (Monday, 13 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Can a URL have a segmented path with zero segments? (Issue #926) (Monday, 13 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Ab (Issue #927) (Friday, 10 July)
• [whatwg/url] Can a URL have a segmented path with zero segments? (Issue #926) (Saturday, 4 July)

James M Snell

• [whatwg/streams] Revisiting ReadableStream.from(syncIter) and ReadableStream.from(str) (Issue #1376) (Monday, 13 July)
• [whatwg/fetch] Add onInformation interim response support (PR #1942) (Saturday, 11 July)
• [whatwg/fetch] Sending trailers (PR #1941) (Saturday, 11 July)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add .trailers to Response/Request (PR #1940) (Saturday, 11 July)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Trailer support in the API (#981) (Saturday, 11 July)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add .trailers to Response/Request (PR #1940) (Saturday, 11 July)
• [whatwg/fetch] Add .trailers to Response/Request (PR #1940) (Saturday, 11 July)

Joey Arhar

• Re: [w3c/uievents] Add .pseudoTarget property to selected event types (PR #413) (Wednesday, 8 July)

Jordan Harband

• Re: [whatwg/webidl] Is a function signature with a parameter type `(DOMString or Interface)` a footgun? (Issue #1604) (Thursday, 9 July)

Julien Cayzac

• Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] "natural" is ambiguous (Issue #275) (Friday, 10 July)

Kagami Sascha Rosylight

• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Add device orientation support (Issue #211) (Tuesday, 14 July)

Kyle

• [w3c/clipboard-apis] [Security Proposal] Allow ClipboardItem to accept a BufferSource such as Uint8Array to harmonize with memory sanitizations (Issue #251) (Saturday, 11 July)

L. David Baron

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Other Spec Review: HTML menu elements (Issue #1242) (Friday, 10 July)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Other Spec Review: HTML menu elements (Issue #1242) (Wednesday, 1 July)

Lee Ash

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create service worker from Blob/String URL (#578) (Sunday, 12 July)

Lia Hiscock

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] (brand new ✨) Web Install API (Issue #1051) (Monday, 13 July)

Linus Groh

• Re: [whatwg/webidl] Is a function signature with a parameter type `(DOMString or Interface)` a footgun? (Issue #1604) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [whatwg/webidl] Update PropertyDescriptor [[Get]]/[[Set]] to [[Getter]]/[[Setter]] (PR #1613) (Thursday, 2 July)

liudonghua

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request with GET/HEAD method cannot have body. (#551) (Friday, 3 July)

Luke Warlow

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WG Revision: CSS Anchor Positioning Level 1 (Issue #1182) (Thursday, 9 July)

Léonie Watson

• Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] "natural" is ambiguous (Issue #275) (Thursday, 9 July)

Marcos Cáceres

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] (brand new ✨) Web Install API (Issue #1051) (Tuesday, 14 July)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Rename document (Issue #478) (Tuesday, 14 July)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Rename document (Issue #478) (Monday, 13 July)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] chore: fix SchemaStore links and drop the embedded schema view (PR #1220) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Create SECURITY.md (PR #1226) (Thursday, 9 July)
• [w3c/manifest] Split privacy and security considerations into separate sections (PR #1224) (Friday, 3 July)
• [w3c/manifest] Recommend user agents let users inspect and modify shortcut URLs (PR #1221) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add `application-context` CSS media feature (PR #1218) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Redefine application context on top-level traversable (PR #1219) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Redefine application context on top-level traversable (PR #1219) (Thursday, 2 July)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrating the HTTP QUERY method (RFC 10008): method normalization, CORS, and caching (Issue #1938) (Wednesday, 1 July)

Martin Thomson

• Re: [whatwg/url] Enumerate differences with URI & IRI in an appendix (PR #923) (Thursday, 2 July)

Matthew Tylee Atkinson

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Other Spec Review: <meta name="text-scale" content="scale" /> (Issue #1172) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Other Spec Review: <meta name="text-scale" content="scale" /> (Issue #1172) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Service discovery (Issue #1243) (Thursday, 2 July)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Service discovery (Issue #1243) (Wednesday, 1 July)

Mattias Buelens

• Re: [whatwg/streams] Use `async_sequence` in `ReadableStream.from` (PR #1372) (Monday, 13 July)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Use `async_sequence` in `ReadableStream.from` (PR #1372) (Saturday, 4 July)

mawalamurday-droid

• [whatwg/webidl] Intent to use bigint/numeric union (Issue #1617) (Wednesday, 8 July)

Meghan Denny

• Re: [whatwg/webidl] Intent to use Constants (Issue #1618) (Tuesday, 14 July)
• Re: [whatwg/webidl] Intent to use Constants (Issue #1616) (Sunday, 5 July)
• Re: [whatwg/url] What is an opaque path? (Issue #922) (Wednesday, 1 July)

Michael Aufreiter

• Re: [w3c/editing] Chrome: Selection barrier at details element when contenteditable=true (Issue #538) (Thursday, 9 July)
• [w3c/uievents] Add normative note to spec regarding "modifier keys on mobile platforms" (Issue #417) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [w3c/editing] Inconsistent `KeyboardEvent.shiftKey` behavior for virtual keyboard autocapitalization (Issue #542) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [w3c/editing] Inconsistent `KeyboardEvent.shiftKey` behavior for virtual keyboard autocapitalization (Issue #542) (Thursday, 9 July)
• [w3c/editing] Inconsistent `KeyboardEvent.shiftKey` behavior for virtual keyboard autocapitalization (Issue #542) (Thursday, 9 July)

Mike Taylor

• Re: [w3c/permissions] Rename document (Issue #478) (Monday, 13 July)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Rename document (Issue #478) (Thursday, 9 July)

misterprincess-prog

• [whatwg/webidl] Intent to use Constants (Issue #1616) (Saturday, 4 July)

Monica Chintala

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Editorial: Queue a task to resolve/reject promise or when fire an event. (PR #1755) (Monday, 13 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Editorial: Queue a task to resolve/reject promise or when fire an event. (PR #1755) (Monday, 13 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Editorial: clarify FetchEvent clientId, resultingClientId, and replacesClientId initialization (PR #1832) (Monday, 13 July)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Editorial: clarify FetchEvent clientId, resultingClientId, and replacesClientId initialization (PR #1832) (Monday, 13 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Formalizing a timeout API (#1292) (Friday, 10 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] clients.get() should not resolve before sandboxing determines the origin of the client (#1385) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] A description mistake in spec document (#1391) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] clients.get() should not resolve before sandboxing determines the origin of the client (#1385) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] clients.get() should not resolve before sandboxing determines the origin of the client (#1385) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Redesign Service-Worker-Allowed header extraction (PR #1830) (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] ready promise is kind of weird after you call unregister() (#1279) (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] ready promise is kind of weird after you call unregister() (#1279) (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Cache's put() says it clones the response (#1382) (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Cache's put() says it clones the response (#1382) (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Tee-ing Cache.put()? (#1367) (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Tee-ing Cache.put()? (#1367) (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] ready promise doesn't work right when controlling registration is resurrected (#1198) (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda - 7 November 2017 (#1206) (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda - 7 November 2017 (#1206) (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should a service worker be allowed to register new service workers? (#1117) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Web Authentication API access in service worker (#1369) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Web Authentication API access in service worker (#1369) (Thursday, 2 July)

Nicolás Peña Moreno

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Which target could we expose in Event Timing? (#838) (Wednesday, 8 July)

Noam Rosenthal

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Adopt node before removing child in replace (PR #1488) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [WICG/webcomponents] Form-associated custom elements: being a submit button (#814) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: improve ensure pre-insert validity (PR #1484) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Other Spec Review: `textStream()` for `Blob` and `Body` (Issue #1236) (Wednesday, 8 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove "allow declarative shadow roots" (PR #1478) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove "allow declarative shadow roots" (PR #1478) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove "allow declarative shadow roots" (PR #1478) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove "allow declarative shadow roots" (PR #1478) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Remove "allow declarative shadow roots" (PR #1478) (Thursday, 2 July)
• [whatwg/dom] Remove "allow declarative shadow roots" (PR #1478) (Wednesday, 1 July)

Piers Wombwell

• [whatwg/dom] Restore deep cloning of shadow root contents. (PR #1480) (Saturday, 4 July)

Randell Jesup

• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Add device orientation support (Issue #211) (Tuesday, 14 July)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] DOM Elements Integration (Issue #227) (Tuesday, 14 July)
• [w3c/gamepad] Trigger HTML activation (PR #230) (Friday, 10 July)

Renato Iannella

• Re: [w3c/permissions] Rename document (Issue #478) (Tuesday, 14 July)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Rename document (Issue #478) (Friday, 10 July)
• Re: [w3c/permissions] Rename document (Issue #478) (Thursday, 9 July)
• [w3c/permissions] Rename document (Issue #478) (Thursday, 9 July)

Sam Atkins

• [w3c/clipboard-apis] "allowed to show a popup" definition link goes nowhere (Issue #250) (Friday, 10 July)

Shannon Booth

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Handle NodeIterator node removal during filtering (PR #1479) (Friday, 3 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Handle NodeIterator node removal during filtering (PR #1479) (Thursday, 2 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Fix NodeIterator pre-remove steps for ancestors of root (PR #1477) (Thursday, 2 July)

Sialuriano

• Re: [whatwg/storage] Add top-level site to storage key. (#127) (PR #144) (Monday, 13 July)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Add top-level site to storage key. (#127) (PR #144) (Monday, 13 July)

smaug----

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Adopt a DocumentFragment with a host like any other node (PR #1486) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Adopt a DocumentFragment with a host like any other node (PR #1486) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Let replaceChildren() replace a document's children (PR #1487) (Thursday, 9 July)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Add .pseudoTarget property to selected event types (PR #413) (Thursday, 2 July)

Sun Shin

• Re: [w3c/gamepad] Should fire events instead of using passive model (#4) (Thursday, 9 July)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Element.matches and pseudo-elements (#185) (Monday, 13 July)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Define a mapping to a Selectors Element Tree (#542) (Monday, 13 July)

Vincent Scheib

• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Should not release pointer lock when pressing esc while fullscreen keyboard lock is active (Issue #110) (Friday, 10 July)

W3C Bot

• [w3ctag/design-reviews] [wg/webappsec] Web Application Security Working Group Charter (Issue #1244) (Saturday, 4 July)

Will Abramson

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WG New Spec: DID Resolution (Issue #1157) (Tuesday, 7 July)

Xiaoqian Wu

• Re: [w3c/editing] forming of community editing group (Issue #541) (Thursday, 9 July)
• [w3c/manifest] Prepare the Manifest spec for CR (Issue #1225) (Monday, 6 July)

Yoichi Osato

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Incubation: Prerendering cross-origin iframes (Issue #1207) (Wednesday, 1 July)

Yoshisato Yanagisawa

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Editorial: clarify FetchEvent clientId, resultingClientId, and replacesClientId initialization (PR #1832) (Tuesday, 14 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] cache and cache-storage algos forgets to queue a task to resolve promise. (Issue #1831) (Friday, 10 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] cache and cache-storage algos forgets to queue a task to resolve promise. (Issue #1831) (Friday, 10 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] A description mistake in spec document (#1391) (Friday, 10 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Redesign Service-Worker-Allowed header extraction (PR #1830) (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Redesign of "extract header list values" expected (#1360) (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should a service worker be allowed to register new service workers? (#1117) (Monday, 6 July)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Redesign Service-Worker-Allowed header extraction (PR #1830) (Friday, 3 July)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Redesign Service-Worker-Allowed header extraction (PR #1830) (Friday, 3 July)

Yves Lafon

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Incubation: Connection Allowlists (Issue #1173) (Thursday, 9 July)

Last message date: Tuesday, 14 July 2026 13:23:21 UTC