Re: [w3c/permissions] Rename document (Issue #478)

riannella left a comment (w3c/permissions#478)

Please read it :-)

You can use an ODRL Policy to express actions permitted/prohibited over an "asset" (which could be an application), including constraints and obligations on parties.  BUT I am not advocating that here.

Since, as you say, "we are scoped to permissions that relate to user agents/browsers", then let that naturally be part of the title of your TR.

FYI: The Linked Storage WG has just released their WD that includes "permissioned access":
   https://www.w3.org/TR/lws10-core/#access-requests-and-grants


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/478#issuecomment-4976120379
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/permissions/issues/478/4976120379@github.com>