- From: Shannon Booth <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 09:35:53 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2026 16:35:57 UTC
@shannonbooth commented on this pull request. > <ol> <li><p>If <var>toBeRemovedNode</var> is not an <a for=tree>inclusive ancestor</a> of - <var>nodeIterator</var>'s <a for=NodeIterator>reference</a>, or <var>toBeRemovedNode</var> is an + <var>nodePointer</var>'s <a for="node pointer">node</a>, or <var>toBeRemovedNode</var> is an This is the same approach ladybird does to fix this scenario (factored slightly differently). I don't have any ideas for a less invasive approach. Though the thing I noticed adjusting the implementation to match this exactly is if I understand correctly, I think nodePointer needs to be defined as a variable here from `nodeIterator` since it's not passed through in "given" -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/1479#pullrequestreview-4619458602 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/1479/review/4619458602@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2026 16:35:57 UTC