public-webapps-github@w3.org from June 2016 by author

Adam Klein

Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) (Monday, 6 June)

Alex Russell

[slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) (Monday, 6 June)

aliams

Re: [whatwg/storage] Miscellaneous editorial feedback (#23) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/storage] Miscellaneous editorial feedback (#23) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Why is delete() disallowed for key cursors? (#62) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Allow delete() on index (#68) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) (Thursday, 2 June)

Andrea Marchesini

Re: [WICG/directory-upload] It is unclear how FormData object gets populated when Upload API is used (#40) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [WICG/directory-upload] It is unclear how FormData object gets populated when Upload API is used (#40) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [WICG/directory-upload] It is unclear how FormData object gets populated when Upload API is used (#40) (Monday, 20 June)

Andrew Betts

Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP) (#122) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) (Friday, 3 June)

Andrew Sutherland

Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Preventing server-forced updates (#822) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] why cant i register a embedded function as for shared worker? (#902) (Saturday, 4 June)

Andy Earnshaw

Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Friday, 10 June)

Anne van Kesteren

Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] root element background propagation issue (#40) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] root element background propagation issue (#40) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add steps to intercept requests using foreign fetch. (#329) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add steps to intercept requests using foreign fetch. (#329) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Link to definition of BufferSource (#316) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Link to definition of BufferSource (#316) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Optional disable setting headers keys in lowercase (#304) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Optional disable setting headers keys in lowercase (#304) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Optional disable setting headers keys in lowercase (#304) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [whatwg/xhr] FormData's append method does not match browsers (#73) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#idl-index (#129) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [whatwg/xhr] FormData's append method does not match browsers (#73) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [whatwg/storage] Exposing cross-origin resource size (#31) (Saturday, 25 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Sentence fragment when making CORS preflight request (#328) (Saturday, 25 June)
Re: [whatwg/storage] Miscellaneous editorial feedback (#23) (Saturday, 25 June)
Re: [whatwg/storage] Miscellaneous editorial feedback (#23) (Saturday, 25 June)
[whatwg/storage] Create explicit security/privacy section (#35) (Saturday, 25 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Saturday, 25 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Saturday, 25 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Meta: add advice on using the Bikeshed HTTP API (#274) (Saturday, 25 June)
Re: [whatwg/storage] Miscellaneous editorial feedback (#23) (Saturday, 25 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] how can i implement a global Interceptor of error with fetchjs (#327) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] how can i implement a global Interceptor of error with fetchjs (#327) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/storage] The term "site" is confusing (#32) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/storage] eTLD -> public suffix? (#33) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/storage] The term "site" is confusing (#32) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/storage] Classify 'Application Cache' as site storage (#30) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/storage] Classify 'Application Cache' as site storage (#30) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/storage] Feedback on the persist() algorithm. (#26) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/storage] Feedback on the persist() algorithm. (#26) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/storage] Define the behavior when calling persist() if the resource has been already used (#25) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/storage] Define the behavior when calling persist() if the resource has been already used (#25) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/storage] Miscellaneous editorial feedback (#23) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/storage] Prevent usage in combination with document.domain (#12) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/storage] Prevent usage in combination with document.domain (#12) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Should WindowClient.navigate(url) navigate with "replacement enabled"? (#918) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [w3c/touch-events] Fix #66. Make all touch events composed events (#67) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [whatwg/xhr] Kill the progress event when readyState is 4 (#72) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/encoding] Handle EUDC before the index in Shift_JIS (#54) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial optimization: Move EUDC before index lookup (#52) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/encoding] Shift-JIS encoding/decoding support (#61) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Tuesday, 21 June)
[whatwg/dom] Note that about:blank also results in quirks mode (#272) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] selectionchange possible improvements (#271) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] selectionchange possible improvements (#271) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/encoding] GBK encoding/decoding support (#56) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Handling Partial Content / 206 (#144) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] When does the openWindow promise resolve? (#728) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is custom elements constructor allowed to attachShadow? (#524) (Monday, 20 June)
[whatwg/storage] UI and origins <> origin groups (#34) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/storage] The term "site" is confusing (#32) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Non-Windows-file URL definition (#128) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) (Friday, 17 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] root element background propagation issue (#40) (Friday, 17 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) (Friday, 17 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Clarify that the namespace check in "create an element" is redundant (#269) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Clarify that the namespace check in "create an element" is redundant (#269) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow or prohibit observedAttributes to observe 'style' attribute? (#521) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow or prohibit observedAttributes to observe 'style' attribute? (#521) (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow or prohibit observedAttributes to observe 'style' attribute? (#521) (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Model HSTS and Upgrade-Insecure-Request as a redirect. (#324) (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Allow for a URL record's object to be a MediaSource or MediaStream (#126) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Allow for a URL record's object to be a MediaSource or MediaStream (#126) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Allow for a URL record's object to be a MediaSource or MediaStream (#126) (Friday, 10 June)
[whatwg/dom] Point out that initial about:blank also results in quirks mode (#268) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] no-referrer should not set referer header (#323) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Allow for a URL record's object to be a MediaSource or MediaStream (#126) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Make sure all responses have a URL list (#322) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Non-http fetch doesn't set response URL (#312) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Allow for a URL record's object to be a MediaSource or MediaStream (#126) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Preserve fragment in Request/Response URLs (#214) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Make sure all responses have a URL list (#322) (Thursday, 9 June)
[whatwg/fetch] Make sure all responses have a URL list (#322) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Non-http fetch doesn't set response URL (#312) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] toggleEventListener (#251) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] toggleEventListener (#251) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Rename rootNode to getRootNode() and add composed argument (#248) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Rename rootNode to getRootNode() and add composed argument (#248) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Rename rootNode to getRootNode() and add composed argument (#248) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] To notify mutation observers should make a copy of signalList before delivering mutation records (#518) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] To notify mutation observers should make a copy of signalList before delivering mutation records (#518) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Wednesday, 8 June)
[slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Expose fragments cross-origin for subresources (#910) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Markup "synthetic events" term as a proper <dfn> (#254) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] UAs create elements in HTML namespace when context object is an HTML … (#267) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] UAs create elements in HTML namespace when context object is an HTML … (#267) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] .createElement's namespace handling doesn't seem to match what UAs do (#264) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] To notify mutation observers should make a copy of signalList before delivering mutation records (#518) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] json() function does not support anti-json hijacking techniques (#321) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] json() function does not support anti-json hijacking techniques (#321) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Fix example of "undefined" custom element state (#266) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP-redirect-fetch preserves all pre-redirect headers for post-redirect request (#320) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP-redirect-fetch preserves all pre-redirect headers for post-redirect request (#320) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/xhr] Sort headers lexicographically in getAllResponseHeaders and combine values too (#50) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/xhr] Should XHR store and send HTTP header names in lower case? (#34) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Consider adding HTML's 401 verbiage (#311) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] same origin requests should allow credentials if credentials mode is sameorigin (#319) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] same origin requests should allow credentials if credentials mode is sameorigin (#319) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] same origin requests should allow credentials if credentials mode is sameorigin (#319) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/xhr] "subresource" destination doesn't exist (#71) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/xhr] "subresource" destination doesn't exist (#71) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] autolink fix: Typo of concept-client-hints-list (#314) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] autolink fix: Typo of concept-client-hints-list (#314) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove an unused variable (#318) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Meaningless stream variable assignment (#317) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove an unused variable (#318) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Rename rootNode to getRootNode() and add composed argument (#248) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Rename rootNode to getRootNode() and add composed argument (#248) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Link to definition of BufferSource (#316) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Repeatedly inserting a custom element may upgrade it twice (#261) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Authenticated PWA ? (#909) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Listing headers safe only for certain values is a bad idea (#313) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Is is possible to read the response before the whole request body is sent? (#315) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Is is possible to read the response before the whole request body is sent? (#315) (Monday, 6 June)
[whatwg/fetch] Meaningless stream variable assignment (#317) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Reserved keyboard shortcut behaviour in fullscreen (#39) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Non-http fetch doesn't set response URL (#312) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Non-http fetch doesn't set response URL (#312) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Save the is="" value an element was created with (#262) (Friday, 3 June)
[whatwg/encoding] Editorial: avoid upsetting lazy compilers (#55) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/encoding] Group constants together in half-width math (#49) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/encoding] Group constants together in half-width math (#49) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: Exclude index entries instead of just pointers (#51) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/encoding] Edititorial: Add a note about duplicates to "index Shift_JIS pointer" (#50) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/encoding] Handle EUDC before the index in Shift_JIS (#54) (Wednesday, 1 June)
[whatwg/encoding] Handle EUDC before the index in Shift_JIS (#54) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/encoding] Please double-check the end of the EUDC range (#53) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Use HTML's 'document base URL' concept. (#258) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Use HTML's 'document base URL' concept. (#258) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Un-customify adopted elements (#260) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Don't set custom element state redundantly (#253) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Don't set custom element state redundantly (#253) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Grammar change: "that is check" to that checks" (#310) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Grammar change: "that is check" to that checks" (#310) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Anssi Kostiainen

Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Presentation API Request for Feedback (#61) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest-csp] fix(index): shortname clash (#10) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest-csp] fix(index): shortname clash (#10) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest-csp] Change status to unofficial (closes #8) (#9) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest-csp] Change status to unofficial (closes #8) (#9) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest-csp] Change to unofficial draft (#8) (Thursday, 23 June)

Anthony Ramine

Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Step 4 of createContextualFragment is not enough (#15) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Special case innerHTML for template parsing; note for outerHTML (#12) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Step 4 of createContextualFragment is not enough (#15) (Monday, 6 June)
[w3c/DOM-Parsing] Step 4 of createContextualFragment is not enough (#15) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Special case innerHTML for template parsing; note for outerHTML (#12) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Special case innerHTML for template parsing; note for outerHTML (#12) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) (Monday, 6 June)

ArkadiuszMichalski

Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Step 4 of createContextualFragment is not enough (#15) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) (Sunday, 5 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Why can't Node's nodeValue use [TreatNullAs=EmptyString]? (#259) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Arthur Stolyar

Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Why doesn't cache.match support `cacheName` (#917) (Saturday, 25 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Should WindowClient.navigate(url) navigate with "replacement enabled"? (#918) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Why doesn't cache.match support `cacheName` (#917) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Friday, 17 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Monday, 6 June)

beidson

Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Specify IDBOpenDBRequest processing as a queue? (#79) (Sunday, 26 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Specify IDBOpenDBRequest processing as a queue? (#79) (Saturday, 25 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Allow delete() on index (#68) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Why is delete() disallowed for key cursors? (#62) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) (Thursday, 2 June)

Ben

Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Monday, 6 June)

Ben Kelly

Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) (Tuesday, 28 June)
[whatwg/streams] ReadableByteStreamControllerClose accesses first element of pendingPullIntos without checking array length (#470) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Optional disable setting headers keys in lowercase (#304) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Why doesn't cache.match support `cacheName` (#917) (Saturday, 25 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Should WindowClient.navigate(url) navigate with "replacement enabled"? (#918) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Communication between workers/windows via Streams API (#244) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Communication between workers/windows via Streams API (#244) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Why doesn't cache.match support `cacheName` (#917) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Saturday, 18 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Friday, 17 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Friday, 17 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Friday, 17 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Friday, 17 June)
[whatwg/fullscreen] root element background propagation issue (#40) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] cache.match should create partial responses if given a range request (#913) (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerContainer spec lists `onerror` as an event handler (#912) (Tuesday, 14 June)
[whatwg/streams] 3.11.4.3. respondWithNewView(view) references `chunk` (#467) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Preserve fragment in Request/Response URLs (#214) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Make sure all responses have a URL list (#322) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] json() function does not support anti-json hijacking techniques (#321) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] consider allowing multiple worker thread instances for a single registration (#756) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] consider allowing multiple worker thread instances for a single registration (#756) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) (Saturday, 4 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] potential http cache issues with importScripts() (#894) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) (Friday, 3 June)
[whatwg/streams] tighten ReadableStreamReaderGenericRelease assertion (#466) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Benjamin Gruenbaum

Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 21 June)

Bevis Tseng

Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) (Wednesday, 1 June)

bmaurer

Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Thursday, 23 June)

Boris Zbarsky

Re: [heycam/webidl] Add forEach to disallowed member names for iterable (#132) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] A non-optional dictionary argument makes sense at times. (#130) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] A non-optional dictionary argument makes sense at times. (#130) (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] Fix incumbent settings object handling (#128) (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] A non-optional dictionary argument makes sense at times. (#130) (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] Fix incumbent settings object handling (#128) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) (Tuesday, 7 June)
[heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Friday, 3 June)

Brandon Jones

Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) (Wednesday, 15 June)
[w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) (Wednesday, 15 June)
[w3c/gamepad] Added GamepadPose and GamepadCapabilities (#25) (Wednesday, 15 June)

Brent

Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) (Tuesday, 21 June)

Brian Kardell

Re: [WICG/modality] Next steps? (#25) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] ARIA (#107) (Monday, 13 June)

Brian Raymor

Re: [w3c/push-api] The user agent should be permitted to acknowledge even if the SW rejects (#196) (Thursday, 9 June)

C. Scott Ananian

Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Special case innerHTML for template parsing; note for outerHTML (#12) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) (Saturday, 4 June)

Cameron McCormack

Re: [heycam/webidl] Update to the ES2017 signature of [[DefineOwnProperty]]. (#120) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] Update to the ES2017 signature of [[DefineOwnProperty]]. (#120) (Thursday, 16 June)

chaals

Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Update 16-07-28-29SW.md (#41) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] pointerlockchange and the accessibility tree (#1) (Friday, 17 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) (Saturday, 11 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) (Saturday, 11 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) (Saturday, 11 June)
Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Update attendee list for the July SW meeting. (#39) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Chieh-Ting Yeh

Re: [whatwg/fetch] Observer API for fetch registry (#65) (Thursday, 30 June)

Chong Zhang

Chris Dickinson

Re: [whatwg/streams] Internal promises that can be rejected need to be handled (#468) (Tuesday, 21 June)

Chris Dumez

Re: [whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) (Monday, 6 June)
[whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) (Monday, 6 June)

Chris Dumoulin

Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)

Chris Palmer

Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Monday, 13 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Friday, 10 June)

Chris Rebert

Re: [whatwg/dom] Enable an event listener to be invoked just once (#207) (Monday, 13 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Markup "synthetic events" term as a proper <dfn> (#254) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Markup "synthetic events" term as a proper <dfn> (#254) (Wednesday, 8 June)

chris van wiemeersch

Re: [w3c/gamepad] Vibrate feature for Gamepad (#19) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) (Wednesday, 15 June)
[w3c/gamepad] Consider changing API to match SDL2's (#24) (Sunday, 12 June)

Chris Wilson

Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) (Monday, 6 June)

cynthia

Re: [w3c/touch-events] Support Event.composed in Touch Events (#66) (Monday, 20 June)

Cyril Auburtin

Re: [w3c/selection-api] Pass the original events or add events types in selectionchange (#65) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] selectionchange possible improvements (#271) (Monday, 20 June)
[whatwg/dom] selectionchange possible improvements (#271) (Monday, 20 June)

Daniel Appelquist

Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) (Wednesday, 8 June)
[w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) (Thursday, 2 June)
[w3ctag/spec-reviews] Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP) (#122) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] URNbis documents (#117) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] CSP (#42) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Daniel Herr

Re: [WICG/directory-upload] Security issue of directory upload: pretend to download when actaully to upload a directory (#38) (Thursday, 9 June)
[WICG/directory-upload] Rename Suggested User Interface Element Text to "Choose folders" (#39) (Thursday, 9 June)

Daniel Murphy

Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Dave Herman

Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)

Dave Tapuska

Re: [whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) (Monday, 6 June)

David Ford

Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Custom]: Need callback for form submit data (bugzilla: 24603) (#187) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components and Form Submit Fields (#529) (Wednesday, 29 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] Web Components and Form Submit Fields (#529) (Wednesday, 29 June)

ddorwin

[heycam/webidl] Add forEach to disallowed member names for iterable (#132) (Thursday, 23 June)

Denis Ah-Kang

Re: [dontcallmedom/webidl-checker] python no longer support headers with a colon (#18) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [dontcallmedom/webidl-checker] python no longer support headers with a colon (#18) (Wednesday, 22 June)
[dontcallmedom/webidl-checker] python no longer support headers with a colon (#18) (Wednesday, 22 June)

Domenic Denicola

Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminate usage of entry and incumbent settings objects (#922) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
[slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminate usage of entry and incumbent settings objects (#922) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Integrate callback invocation with IDL (#186) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components and Form Submit Fields (#529) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Web Components and Form Submit Fields (#529) (Wednesday, 29 June)
[whatwg/streams] Tweak ReadableByteStreamControllerEnqueue algorithm structure (#473) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Tighten the assertion on the owner stream in ReadableStreamReaderGene… (#472) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] tighten ReadableStreamReaderGenericRelease assertion (#466) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] ReadableByteStreamControllerClose accesses first element of pendingPullIntos without checking array length (#470) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Fix pendingPullIntos access in ReadableByteStreamControllerClose() (#471) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) (Monday, 27 June)
[whatwg/xhr] FormData's append method does not match browsers (#73) (Sunday, 26 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Saturday, 25 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Friday, 24 June)
[whatwg/dom] Meta: add advice on using the Bikeshed HTTP API (#274) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Communication between workers/windows via Streams API (#244) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Should ReadableStreams with pull sources call pull until full? (#469) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Should ReadableStreams with pull sources call pull until full? (#469) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why does upgrade-an-element queue attribute, connected reactions before exiting early? (#523) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Internal promises that can be rejected need to be handled (#468) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Internal promises that can be rejected need to be handled (#468) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Internal promises that can be rejected need to be handled (#468) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is custom elements constructor allowed to attachShadow? (#524) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) (Monday, 20 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is custom elements constructor allowed to attachShadow? (#524) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is custom elements constructor allowed to attachShadow? (#524) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why does upgrade-an-element queue attribute, connected reactions before exiting early? (#523) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When to invoke custom element reactions that were enqueued outside of DOM operations? (#522) (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] Fix incumbent settings object handling (#128) (Wednesday, 15 June)
[whatwg/dom] Clarify that the namespace check in "create an element" is redundant (#269) (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow or prohibit observedAttributes to observe 'style' attribute? (#521) (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) (Monday, 13 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] Proposal: allow subclasses of constructible built-ins to be constructed (#125) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] Proposal: allow subclasses of constructible built-ins to be constructed (#125) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Synchronous (or asynchronous) state probing on WritableStream (#463) (Tuesday, 7 June)
[whatwg/dom] Fix example of "undefined" custom element state (#266) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Saturday, 4 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Friday, 3 June)
[heycam/webidl] Fix incumbent settings object handling (#128) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] light weight transformations (#461) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Synchronous queue draining for WritableStream (#465) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Synchronous (or asynchronous) state probing on WritableStream (#463) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Align WritableStream structure with ReadableStream structure (#462) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Align WritableStream structure with ReadableStream structure (#462) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Align WritableStream structure with ReadableStream structure (#462) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Align WritableStream structure with ReadableStream structure (#462) (Wednesday, 1 June)
[whatwg/dom] Save the is="" value an element was created with (#262) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Wednesday, 1 June)
[whatwg/fetch] Consider adding HTML's 401 verbiage (#311) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Repeatedly inserting a custom element may upgrade it twice (#261) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Why can't Node's nodeValue use [TreatNullAs=EmptyString]? (#259) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Why can't Node's nodeValue use [TreatNullAs=EmptyString]? (#259) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Dominic Cooney

Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) (Monday, 20 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] Why does upgrade-an-element queue attribute, connected reactions before exiting early? (#523) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Friday, 3 June)
[whatwg/dom] Repeatedly inserting a custom element may upgrade it twice (#261) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Dominic Tarr

Re: [whatwg/streams] light weight transformations (#461) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] light weight transformations (#461) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] light weight transformations (#461) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Dominick Ng

Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Reserved keyboard shortcut behaviour in fullscreen (#39) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Reserved keyboard shortcut behaviour in fullscreen (#39) (Thursday, 2 June)
[whatwg/fullscreen] Reserved keyboard shortcut behaviour in fullscreen (#39) (Thursday, 2 June)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

[w3c/selection-api] Normative refernces (#69) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [dontcallmedom/webidl-checker] python no longer support headers with a colon (#18) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [dontcallmedom/webidl-checker] python no longer support headers with a colon (#18) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [dontcallmedom/webidl-checker] python no longer support headers with a colon (#18) (Wednesday, 22 June)

Dru Knox

Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Tuesday, 21 June)

Duan Yao

Re: [whatwg/fetch] json() function does not support anti-json hijacking techniques (#321) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] json() function does not support anti-json hijacking techniques (#321) (Wednesday, 8 June)

Elliott Sprehn

Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) (Saturday, 25 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Wednesday, 8 June)

Erik Isaksen

Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Best practices for styling web components (#510) (Sunday, 5 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Best practices for styling web components (#510) (Friday, 3 June)

Gary Kacmarcik

Re: [w3c/uievents] Fix #89. Make some of UI Events composed events (#91) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [w3c/uievents] Support Event.composed (#89) (Monday, 27 June)

Guilherme

[w3c/manifest] Allow unique start_url for subdomains (#470) (Monday, 13 June)

Guillaume Gomez

Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Step 4 of createContextualFragment is not enough (#15) (Monday, 6 June)

Hallvord R. M. Steen

Re: [whatwg/xhr] Kill the progress event when readyState is 4 (#72) (Saturday, 25 June)
[whatwg/xhr] Kill the progress event when readyState is 4 (#72) (Tuesday, 21 June)

Harald Alvestrand

Re: [heycam/webidl] A non-optional dictionary argument makes sense at times. (#130) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] A non-optional dictionary argument makes sense at times. (#130) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] A non-optional dictionary argument makes sense at times. (#130) (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] A non-optional dictionary argument makes sense at times. (#130) (Wednesday, 15 June)
[heycam/webidl] A non-optional dictionary argument makes sense at times. (#130) (Tuesday, 14 June)

Hayato Ito

Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [w3c/uievents] Support Event.composed (#89) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/touch-events] Fix #66. Make all touch events composed events (#67) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/uievents] Fix #89. Make some of UI Events composed events (#91) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) (Friday, 24 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) (Friday, 24 June)
[whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/uievents] Support Event.composed (#89) (Thursday, 23 June)
[w3c/uievents] Fix #89. Make some of UI Events composed events (#91) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/touch-events] Fix #66. Make all touch events composed events (#67) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [w3c/touch-events] Fix #66. Make all touch events composed events (#67) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Shadow]: rename <content> to <slot> (bugzilla: 28561) (#92) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [w3c/touch-events] Support Event.composed in Touch Events (#66) (Tuesday, 21 June)
[w3c/touch-events] Fix #66. Make all touch events composed events (#67) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] HTMLElement.prototype.offsetParent leaks a node inside a shadow tree (#497) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] HTMLElement.prototype.offsetParent leaks a node inside a shadow tree (#497) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Monday, 20 June)
[w3c/touch-events] Support Event.composed in Touch Events (#66) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Idea: ComposedTreeProxy (#516) (Monday, 13 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Idea: ComposedTreeProxy (#516) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Wednesday, 8 June)
[w3c/uievents] Support Event.composed (#89) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Idea: ComposedTreeProxy (#516) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When is `slotchange` handler fired? (#515) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When is `slotchange` handler fired? (#515) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree? (#504) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Friday, 3 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree? (#504) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree? (#504) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and requestPointerLock(), fullscreenElement (#192) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] flatten: true in assignedNodes doesn't make much sense when a slot doesn't have display: contents (#493) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] flatten: true in assignedNodes doesn't make much sense when a slot doesn't have display: contents (#493) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] HTMLElement.prototype.offsetParent leaks a node inside a shadow tree (#497) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] What happens in these slot/content scenarios? (#508) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] What happens in these slot/content scenarios? (#508) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Henri Sivonen

[whatwg/encoding] Editorial: Clean up gb18030 math (#63) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/encoding] Group constants together in half-width math (#49) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: avoid upsetting lazy compilers (#55) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: avoid upsetting lazy compilers (#55) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/encoding] Handle EUDC before the index in Shift_JIS (#54) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/encoding] Handle EUDC before the index in Shift_JIS (#54) (Tuesday, 21 June)
[whatwg/encoding] Please double-check the end of the EUDC range (#53) (Wednesday, 1 June)
[whatwg/encoding] Editorial optimization: Move EUDC before index lookup (#52) (Wednesday, 1 June)
[whatwg/encoding] Editorial: Exclude index entries instead of just pointers (#51) (Wednesday, 1 June)
[whatwg/encoding] Edititorial: Add a note about duplicates to "index Shift_JIS pointer" (#50) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/encoding] index-jis0208.txt should be JIS X 0208 and add another index file (#47) (Wednesday, 1 June)

hober

[w3c/WebPlatformWG] Update attendee list for the July SW meeting. (#39) (Tuesday, 7 June)

I-Maps

Re: [whatwg/xhr] Abandon hope of removing sync XHR from the web platform? (#20) (Friday, 10 June)

Ian Kilpatrick

Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Allow expressions in addition to keyPaths when creating indexes (#33) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)

Ilya Grigorik

Re: [whatwg/fetch] Listing headers safe only for certain values is a bad idea (#313) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Listing headers safe only for certain values is a bad idea (#313) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Listing headers safe only for certain values is a bad idea (#313) (Friday, 3 June)

isonmad

Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) (Thursday, 16 June)
[whatwg/fetch] Link to definition of BufferSource (#316) (Sunday, 5 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Thursday, 2 June)

Ivan Herman

Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Review Web Annotations specs (#93) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) (Thursday, 23 June)

Iván Sánchez Ortega

Re: [w3c/uievents] Expose ticks in wheel events (#17) (Friday, 3 June)

J.C. Jones

Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Monday, 27 June)

Jake Archibald

Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminating SW startup latency for common case (#920) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Handling Partial Content / 206 (#144) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] cache.match should create partial responses if given a range request (#913) (Friday, 17 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Service worker not working when tested on mobile using local ip. (#914) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Service worker not working when tested on mobile using local ip. (#914) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] cache.match should create partial responses if given a range request (#913) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] cache.match should create partial responses if given a range request (#913) (Thursday, 16 June)
[slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] cache.match should create partial responses if given a range request (#913) (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Handling Partial Content / 206 (#144) (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Handling Partial Content / 206 (#144) (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] New Push API Capable of handling and/or matching Facebook Message and Apple iMessage (#911) (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] New Push API Capable of handling and/or matching Facebook Message and Apple iMessage (#911) (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Wednesday, 8 June)
[w3c/WebPlatformWG] I'm attending (#40) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] need AsyncLocalStorage (was #904) (#906) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] need AsyncLocalStorage (was #904) (#906) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Is is possible to read the response before the whole request body is sent? (#315) (Saturday, 4 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Auto-cache imported scripts (#908) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] potential http cache issues with importScripts() (#894) (Friday, 3 June)
[slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Auto-cache imported scripts (#908) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Handling Partial Content / 206 (#144) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Secure Client-Subscribed 1:M Broadcast message delivery (#901) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Secure Client-Subscribed 1:M Broadcast message delivery (#901) (Thursday, 2 June)

Jan Miksovsky

Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) (Tuesday, 7 June)

jan-ivar

Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Monday, 13 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Jeffrey Yasskin

Re: [w3c/permissions] Give the UA permission to return anything it wants from query(). (#97) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Define an algorithm to update the permission storage. (#91) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Allow UAs to maintain zero or multiple permission stores. (#95) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Describe the permission store using constraints instead of a full model. (#96) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Describe the permission store using constraints instead of a full model. (#96) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Define an algorithm to update the permission storage. (#91) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Jimmy Karl Roland Wärting

[w3c/FileAPI] Streams is hot, FileReader.readAs____ is not (#40) (Saturday, 11 June)

JoeArizona

[whatwg/url] Non-Windows-file URL definition (#128) (Sunday, 19 June)

Joey Smith

Re: [whatwg/dom] Make Attr a Node again (#102) (Friday, 17 June)

Johannes Wilm

Re: [w3c/editing] beforeinput should be fired only when the DOM change is caused by direct input by keypress or composition (#43) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/editing] beforeinput should be fired only when the DOM change is caused by direct input by keypress or composition (#43) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/editing] beforeinput should be fired only when the DOM change is caused by direct input by keypress or composition (#43) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/editing] beforeinput should be fired only when the DOM change is caused by direct input by keypress or composition (#43) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/editing] Add a mechanism to opt-in/opt-out editing features (#93) (Saturday, 11 June)
Re: [w3c/editing] should not use the shadow DOM for beforeInput (#76) (Saturday, 11 June)
Re: [w3c/editing] should not use the shadow DOM for beforeInput (#76) (Saturday, 11 June)
Re: [w3c/editing] Add a mechanism to opt-in/opt-out editing features (#93) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/editing] When should UA synthesize heights of an element? (#70) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/editing] should not use the shadow DOM for beforeInput (#76) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/editing] list all required editTypes for beforeEdit/Edit events (#79) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/editing] list all required editTypes for beforeEdit/Edit events (#79) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/editing] inputType should be tied to the command names and having that tied to a way of declaring what you support (#110) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/editing] We need a new static range API (#91) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/editing] We need a new static range API (#91) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/editing] Cancelable attribute should be removed from the spec because it already referenced in Event.idl (#100) (Saturday, 4 June)
Re: [w3c/editing] We should update the spec with an ImmutableStaticRange that is a subset of the Range interface and return them via the getTargetRanges method. s/ImmutableStaticRange/StaticRange/ in the actual spec (#104) (Saturday, 4 June)
Re: [w3c/editing] We should update the spec with an ImmutableStaticRange that is a subset of the Range interface and return them via the getTargetRanges method. s/ImmutableStaticRange/StaticRange/ in the actual spec (#104) (Saturday, 4 June)
Re: [w3c/editing] [beforeinput] Should we allow canceling the committed text from IME? (#128) (Saturday, 4 June)
Re: [w3c/editing] New API: Selection#makeVisible() (#129) (Saturday, 4 June)

John Schulz

Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Different ways to run a CFC? (#38) (Tuesday, 7 June)

Jon Walsh

Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) (Sunday, 5 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) (Sunday, 5 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) (Saturday, 4 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Handling Partial Content / 206 (#144) (Saturday, 4 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Handling Partial Content / 206 (#144) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Receivers of ranged responses must ensure all ranges come from the same underlying resource (#703) (Friday, 3 June)

Jonas Sicking

Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Allow delete() on index (#68) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Allow delete() on index (#68) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Listing headers safe only for certain values is a bad idea (#313) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Listing headers safe only for certain values is a bad idea (#313) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Listing headers safe only for certain values is a bad idea (#313) (Friday, 3 June)
[whatwg/fetch] Listing headers safe only for certain values is a bad idea (#313) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Joseph Orbegoso Pea

Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When is `slotchange` handler fired? (#515) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Ability to define Custom Element attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters for those attributes). (#517) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] distributedCallback for Custom Elements (#527) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] distributedCallback for Custom Elements (#527) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] distributedCallback for Custom Elements (#527) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Tuesday, 28 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] Event retargetting in layman's terms? (#528) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) (Saturday, 25 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] [idea] distributedCallback (#527) (Saturday, 25 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) (Saturday, 25 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) (Saturday, 25 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Saturday, 25 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is or how can Shadow DOM be 'SEO friendly'? (#500) (Monday, 13 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is or how can Shadow DOM be 'SEO friendly'? (#500) (Monday, 13 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Alternative proposal for closed shadow DOM (#499) (Monday, 13 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Alternative proposal for closed shadow DOM (#499) (Monday, 13 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Idea: ComposedTreeProxy (#516) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Ability to define Custom Element attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters for those attributes). (#517) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Idea: ComposedTreeProxy (#516) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When is `slotchange` handler fired? (#515) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) (Thursday, 9 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) (Tuesday, 7 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) (Tuesday, 7 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] Idea: ComposedTreeProxy (#516) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) (Monday, 6 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] When is `slotchange` handler fired? (#515) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree? (#504) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree? (#504) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree? (#504) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree? (#504) (Friday, 3 June)

Josh Matthews

Re: [whatwg/fetch] Sentence fragment when making CORS preflight request (#328) (Friday, 24 June)
[whatwg/fetch] Sentence fragment when making CORS preflight request (#328) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP-redirect-fetch preserves all pre-redirect headers for post-redirect request (#320) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP-redirect-fetch preserves all pre-redirect headers for post-redirect request (#320) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP-redirect-fetch preserves all pre-redirect headers for post-redirect request (#320) (Tuesday, 7 June)
[whatwg/fetch] HTTP-redirect-fetch preserves all pre-redirect headers for post-redirect request (#320) (Tuesday, 7 June)

Joshua Bell

Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Specify IDBOpenDBRequest processing as a queue? (#79) (Sunday, 26 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Specify IDBOpenDBRequest processing as a queue? (#79) (Saturday, 25 June)
[w3c/IndexedDB] Specify IDBOpenDBRequest processing as a queue? (#79) (Friday, 24 June)
[w3c/IndexedDB] deleteDatabase's "versionchange" should be deferred if upgrade is running (#78) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Allow expressions in addition to keyPaths when creating indexes (#33) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support N-dimensional queries on indexes (#40) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Allow expressions in addition to keyPaths when creating indexes (#33) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Remove the / -> : replacement from the File constructor (#41) (Friday, 17 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Enforce transaction commit ordering more strictly (#77) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support batch cursors (#54) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support batch cursors (#54) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Rewindable cursors (#55) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Rewindable cursors (#55) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Enforce transaction commit ordering more strictly (#77) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support N-dimensional queries on indexes (#40) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Support Files stored by reference (#56) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Why is delete() disallowed for key cursors? (#62) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Allow delete() on index (#68) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Return number of records deleted (#32) (Wednesday, 1 June)

jplaisted

Re: [whatwg/streams] Should ReadableStreams with pull sources call pull until full? (#469) (Thursday, 23 June)
[whatwg/streams] Should ReadableStreams with pull sources call pull until full? (#469) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Internal promises that can be rejected need to be handled (#468) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Internal promises that can be rejected need to be handled (#468) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Internal promises that can be rejected need to be handled (#468) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Internal promises that can be rejected need to be handled (#468) (Tuesday, 21 June)
[whatwg/streams] Internal promises that can be rejected need to be handled (#468) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Should consumers of readers/streams be notified why a stream was canceled? (#448) (Saturday, 4 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Should consumers of readers/streams be notified why a stream was canceled? (#448) (Saturday, 4 June)

JR Conlin

Re: [w3c/push-api] Describe process for subscription updates (#132) (Saturday, 11 June)

Jungkee Song

Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Eliminate usage of entry and incumbent settings objects (#922) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] When does the openWindow promise resolve? (#728) (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] what should the document base URI for an intercepted navigation (#787) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] what should the document base URI for an intercepted navigation (#787) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Allow waitUntil to be called multiple times, async (#771) (Thursday, 2 June)

Justin Fagnani

Re: [whatwg/dom] Disconnect single target instead of all (#126) (Friday, 24 June)

Kagami Sascha Rosylight

Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 21 June)

Kenneth Rohde Christiansen

Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(installation): clarify installation event (closes #473) (4fa1775) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] https://w3c.github.io/manifest/ redirects to http://manifest.sysapps.org/ (#469) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) (Tuesday, 7 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) (Monday, 6 June)

Kevin Suttle

Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Custom]: define registry primitive; ("namespace" support needed?) (bugzilla: 24578) (#154) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [Custom]: define registry primitive; ("namespace" support needed?) (bugzilla: 24578) (#154) (Saturday, 18 June)

Kinna

Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Cannot scroll in IE11 while in fullscreen by Fullscreen API (#23) (Friday, 10 June)

Kit Cambridge

Re: [w3c/push-api] Describe process for subscription updates (#132) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] Fire an event when push server connectivity changes (#194) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] Fire an event when push server connectivity changes (#194) (Wednesday, 8 June)
[w3c/push-api] Fire an event when push server connectivity changes (#194) (Sunday, 5 June)

Koji Ishii

Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) (Tuesday, 21 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] Is custom elements constructor allowed to attachShadow? (#524) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why does upgrade-an-element queue attribute, connected reactions before exiting early? (#523) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow or prohibit observedAttributes to observe 'style' attribute? (#521) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When to invoke custom element reactions that were enqueued outside of DOM operations? (#522) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When to invoke custom element reactions that were enqueued outside of DOM operations? (#522) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When to invoke custom element reactions that were enqueued outside of DOM operations? (#522) (Wednesday, 15 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] When to invoke custom element reactions that were enqueued outside of DOM operations? (#522) (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow or prohibit observedAttributes to observe 'style' attribute? (#521) (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow or prohibit observedAttributes to observe 'style' attribute? (#521) (Wednesday, 15 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] Allow or prohibit observedAttributes to observe 'style' attribute? (#521) (Tuesday, 14 June)

Kris Siegel

Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)

liebrand

[slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Authenticated PWA ? (#909) (Sunday, 5 June)

lostmsu

Re: [whatwg/fetch] json() function does not support anti-json hijacking techniques (#321) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] json() function does not support anti-json hijacking techniques (#321) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] json() function does not support anti-json hijacking techniques (#321) (Wednesday, 8 June)
[whatwg/fetch] json() function does not support anti-json hijacking techniques (#321) (Tuesday, 7 June)

Léonie Watson

Re: [w3c/pointerlock] pointerlockchange and the accessibility tree (#1) (Saturday, 18 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] I'm attending (#40) (Wednesday, 8 June)
[w3c/WebPlatformWG] Different ways to run a CFC? (#38) (Friday, 3 June)

Manish Goregaokar

Re: [whatwg/fetch] no-referrer should not set referer header (#323) (Friday, 10 June)
[whatwg/fetch] no-referrer should not set referer header (#323) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Make sure all responses have a URL list (#322) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Make sure all responses have a URL list (#322) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Consider adding HTML's 401 verbiage (#311) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] same origin requests should allow credentials if credentials mode is sameorigin (#319) (Tuesday, 7 June)
[whatwg/fetch] same origin requests should allow credentials if credentials mode is sameorigin (#319) (Tuesday, 7 June)
[whatwg/fetch] Non-http fetch doesn't set response URL (#312) (Thursday, 2 June)
[whatwg/xhr] "subresource" destination doesn't exist (#71) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Marcos Cáceres

Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(installation): clarify installation event (closes #473) (#474) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(installation): clarify installation event (closes #473) (#474) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Include Minimal Store/Catalog MetaData in Manifest (#448) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Include Minimal Store/Catalog MetaData in Manifest (#448) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Support registering "actions" (#442) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Support registering "actions" (#442) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Support registering "actions" (#442) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(installation): clarify installation event (closes #473) (4fa1775) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Include Minimal Store/Catalog MetaData in Manifest (#448) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Include Minimal Store/Catalog MetaData in Manifest (#448) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(installation): clarify installation event (closes #473) (#474) (Tuesday, 28 June)
[w3c/manifest] Fix(installation): clarify installation event (closes #473) (#474) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Need to specify client of image objects when fetching (an environment settings object) (#465) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Need to specify client of image objects when fetching... (#465) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Allow unique start_url for subdomains (#470) (Thursday, 23 June)
[w3c/manifest] Expose API for managing Web App aspects (#472) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest-csp] Change status to unofficial (closes #8) (#9) (Thursday, 23 June)
[w3c/manifest-csp] fix(index): shortname clash (#10) (Thursday, 23 June)
[w3c/manifest-csp] Change status to unofficial (closes #8) (#9) (Thursday, 23 June)
[w3c/manifest-csp] Change to unofficial draft (#8) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) (Monday, 20 June)
[WICG/modality] Next steps? (#25) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] https://w3c.github.io/manifest/ redirects to http://manifest.sysapps.org/ (#469) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] https://w3c.github.io/manifest/ redirects to http://manifest.sysapps.org/ (#469) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] https://w3c.github.io/manifest/ redirects to http://manifest.sysapps.org/ (#469) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] https://w3c.github.io/manifest/ redirects to http://manifest.sysapps.org/ (#469) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Different ways to run a CFC? (#38) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) (Monday, 6 June)

Marijn Kruisselbrink

Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add steps to intercept requests using foreign fetch. (#329) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add steps to intercept requests using foreign fetch. (#329) (Wednesday, 29 June)
[whatwg/fetch] Add steps to intercept requests using foreign fetch. (#329) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Specify serviceworker link type for link element and link header. (#828) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Don't associate a job with a client, instead just have a referrer. (#889) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Don't associate a job with a client, instead just have a referrer. (#889) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Change "validate the response" to "process the response" to match HTML (#876) (Thursday, 23 June)
[slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Need to review the algorithms for creating a new environment settings object (#919) (Thursday, 23 June)
[slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Should WindowClient.navigate(url) navigate with "replacement enabled"? (#918) (Thursday, 23 June)
[w3c/WebPlatformWG] Update 16-07-28-29SW.md (#41) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) (Friday, 17 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) (Thursday, 16 June)
[whatwg/url] Origin of blob URLs doesn't match what implementations do (#127) (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Should foreign fetch work same-origin? (#826) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Should foreign fetch work same-origin? (#826) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Should foreign fetch work same-origin? (#826) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Auto-cache imported scripts (#908) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Auto-cache imported scripts (#908) (Friday, 3 June)

Mark Nottingham

Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Is is possible to read the response before the whole request body is sent? (#315) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Listing headers safe only for certain values is a bad idea (#313) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] CSP (#42) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] CSP (#42) (Thursday, 2 June)

Martin Thomson

Re: [w3c/push-api] Pass removed subscriptions as a property of the `pushsubscriptionchange` event (#193) (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] Pass removed subscriptions as a property of the `pushsubscriptionchange` event (#193) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] Describe process for subscription updates (#132) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] Acknowledge messages that fail to decrypt (#195) (Thursday, 9 June)
[w3c/push-api] The user agent should be permitted to acknowledge even if the SW rejects (#196) (Thursday, 9 June)
[w3c/push-api] Acknowledge messages that fail to decrypt (#195) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/permissions] Give the UA permission to return anything it wants from query(). (#97) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] Fire an event when push server connectivity changes (#194) (Wednesday, 8 June)

Matt Falkenhagen

Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Saturday, 18 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Friday, 17 June)
[slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Friday, 17 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) (Friday, 17 June)

Matt Giuca

Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Install event definition is missing some details (#475) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(installation): clarify installation event (closes #473) (#474) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Fix(installation): clarify installation event (closes #473) (#474) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Add beforeinstallprompt event (#417) (Tuesday, 28 June)
[w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) (Tuesday, 28 June)

Matt N.

Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Michael van Ouwerkerk

Re: [w3c/push-api] The user agent should be permitted to acknowledge even if the SW rejects (#196) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] The user agent should be permitted to acknowledge even if the SW rejects (#196) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] Acknowledge messages that fail to decrypt (#195) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] Acknowledge messages that fail to decrypt (#195) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] The user agent should be permitted to acknowledge even if the SW rejects (#196) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] Acknowledge messages that fail to decrypt (#195) (Thursday, 9 June)

Michael[tm] Smith

Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Event retargetting in layman's terms? (#528) (Tuesday, 28 June)

Michiel Bijl

Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] Different ways to run a CFC? (#38) (Tuesday, 7 June)

Mihai Potra

Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) (Monday, 13 June)

Mike West

[whatwg/fetch] Model HSTS and Upgrade-Insecure-Request as a redirect. (#324) (Monday, 13 June)

Mohamed Hafez

Re: [w3c/push-api] Pass removed subscriptions as a property of the `pushsubscriptionchange` event (#193) (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] Pass removed subscriptions as a property of the `pushsubscriptionchange` event (#193) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] Pass removed subscriptions as a property of the `pushsubscriptionchange` event (#193) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] Pass removed subscriptions as a property of the `pushsubscriptionchange` event (#193) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] Describe process for subscription updates (#132) (Saturday, 11 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] Auto-retrying Webhook for re-subscribing in ServiceWorker (#197) (Saturday, 11 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] Auto-retrying Webhook for re-subscribing in ServiceWorker (#197) (Saturday, 11 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] Describe process for subscription updates (#132) (Saturday, 11 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] Pass removed subscriptions as a property of the `pushsubscriptionchange` event (#193) (Saturday, 11 June)
[w3c/push-api] Auto-retrying webhook for re-subscribing in ServiceWorker (#197) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/push-api] Describe process for subscription updates (#132) (Friday, 10 June)

Mounir Lamouri

Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Allow fullscreen to be triggered by an orientation change event (#34) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Allow fullscreen to be triggered by an orientation change event (#34) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Allow fullscreen to be triggered by an orientation change event (#34) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Allow fullscreen to be triggered by an orientation change event (#34) (Thursday, 23 June)

Ms2ger

[heycam/webidl] Use OrdinaryGetOwnProperty. (#131) (Monday, 20 June)
[w3c/FileAPI] Remove the / -> : replacement from the File constructor (#41) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Step 4 of createContextualFragment is not enough (#15) (Monday, 6 June)

Owen Campbell-Moore

Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] WebUSB (#108) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Patrick H. Lauke

Re: [w3c/touch-events] Define interactions with `contextmenu` event? (#68) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/touch-events] Fix #66. Make all touch events composed events (#67) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/touch-events] Support Event.composed in Touch Events (#66) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/touch-events] Expand mouse events/click note to specify these are usually only fired for tap (#63) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Paul Kinlan

Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) (Wednesday, 8 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) (Thursday, 2 June)

Pedram Emrouznejad

Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Peter Linss

Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Performance API's, Security and Privacy (#120) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Motion path spec (#66) (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Motion path spec (#66) (Monday, 13 June)

Philip Jägenstedt

Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Allow fullscreen to be triggered by an orientation change event (#34) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Allow fullscreen to be triggered by an orientation change event (#34) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Allow fullscreen to be triggered by an orientation change event (#34) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Allow for a URL record's object to be a MediaSource or MediaStream (#126) (Monday, 13 June)
Re: [whatwg/url] Allow for a URL record's object to be a MediaSource or MediaStream (#126) (Thursday, 9 June)
[whatwg/url] Allow for a URL record's object to be a MediaSource or MediaStream (#126) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] https://w3c.github.io/manifest/ redirects to http://manifest.sysapps.org/ (#469) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] https://w3c.github.io/manifest/ redirects to http://manifest.sysapps.org/ (#469) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] https://w3c.github.io/manifest/ redirects to http://manifest.sysapps.org/ (#469) (Wednesday, 8 June)
[w3c/manifest] https://w3c.github.io/manifest/ redirects to http://manifest.sysapps.org/ (#469) (Wednesday, 8 June)

PhistucK

Re: [whatwg/fetch] Optional disable setting headers keys in lowercase (#304) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Optional disable setting headers keys in lowercase (#304) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Optional disable setting headers keys in lowercase (#304) (Monday, 27 June)

publicocean0

Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] why cant i register a embedded function as for shared worker? (#902) (Saturday, 4 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] why cant i register a embedded function as for shared worker? (#902) (Saturday, 4 June)
[w3c/workers] service worker enprovements (#4) (Friday, 3 June)
[w3c/workers] shared worker bugs/missing parts (#3) (Friday, 3 June)

Pyry Kovanen

Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 21 June)

r12a

Re: [whatwg/encoding] gb18030 encoding/decoding support (#57) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [whatwg/encoding] ISO 2022-jp encoding/decoding support (#60) (Thursday, 23 June)
[whatwg/encoding] EUK-kr encoding/decoding support (#62) (Monday, 20 June)
[whatwg/encoding] Shift-JIS encoding/decoding support (#61) (Monday, 20 June)
[whatwg/encoding] ISO 2022-jp encoding/decoding support (#60) (Monday, 20 June)
[whatwg/encoding] EUC-jp encoding/decoding support (#59) (Monday, 20 June)
[whatwg/encoding] Big5 encoding/decoding support (#58) (Monday, 20 June)
[whatwg/encoding] gb18030 encoding/decoding support (#57) (Monday, 20 June)
[whatwg/encoding] GBK encoding/decoding support (#56) (Monday, 20 June)

Rafał Ruciński

Re: [whatwg/fetch] Is is possible to read the response before the whole request body is sent? (#315) (Saturday, 4 June)
[whatwg/fetch] Is is possible to read the response before the whole request body is sent? (#315) (Saturday, 4 June)

raymeskhoury

Re: [w3c/permissions] Only allow permissions.request() during user interaction (#77) (Friday, 3 June)

Remy Sharp

Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Why doesn't cache.match support `cacheName` (#917) (Saturday, 25 June)
[slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Why doesn't cache.match support `cacheName` (#917) (Wednesday, 22 June)

Richard Maher

[slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] New Push API Capable of handling and/or matching Facebook Message and Apple iMessage (#911) (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Secure Client-Subscribed 1:M Broadcast message delivery (#901) (Friday, 3 June)

Rick Byers

Re: [w3c/touch-events] Fix #66. Make all touch events composed events (#67) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/touch-events] Support Event.composed in Touch Events (#66) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/touch-events] Fix #66. Make all touch events composed events (#67) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Install event definition is missing some details (#475) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Install event definition is missing some details (#475) (Wednesday, 29 June)
[w3c/manifest] Install event definition is missing some details (#475) (Wednesday, 29 June)
[w3c/touch-events] Define interactions with `contextmenu` event? (#68) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [w3c/uievents] Gamepad-specific DOM keys / location? (#79) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/uievents] Support Event.composed (#89) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/touch-events] Fix #66. Make all touch events composed events (#67) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] What happens if a 'once' eventListener dispatches a similar event? (#265) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/uievents] Expose ticks in wheel events (#17) (Friday, 3 June)

Rick Lee

[whatwg/fetch] how can i implement a global Interceptor of error with fetchjs (#327) (Friday, 24 June)

Rob Dodson

Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) (Thursday, 9 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) (Thursday, 9 June)

Rob Dolin (MSFT)

Re: [w3c/manifest] Tidy up the install event specification (#473) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/manifest] Include Minimal Store/Catalog MetaData in Manifest (#448) (Tuesday, 28 June)

roryhewitt

Re: [whatwg/fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] RFC: a mechanism to bypass CORS preflight (#210) (Thursday, 9 June)

Ruben Verborgh

Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) (Thursday, 23 June)
[whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) (Wednesday, 22 June)

Russell Bicknell

Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Thursday, 23 June)

Ryosuke Niwa

Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Saturday, 25 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allowing custom element registrations on per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Saturday, 25 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] ShadowRoot.styleSheets should return an empty StyleSheetList if the shadow root is not in a shadow-including document (#526) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] "In a document" confusion (#238) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is custom elements constructor allowed to attachShadow? (#524) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is custom elements constructor allowed to attachShadow? (#524) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is custom elements constructor allowed to attachShadow? (#524) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Is custom elements constructor allowed to attachShadow? (#524) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should innerHTML propagate custom element constructor exceptions? (#525) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Allow or prohibit observedAttributes to observe 'style' attribute? (#521) (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Declarative syntax for custom elements (#136) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When is `slotchange` handler fired? (#515) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] To notify mutation observers should make a copy of signalList before delivering mutation records (#518) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] To notify mutation observers should make a copy of signalList before delivering mutation records (#518) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] To notify mutation observers should make a copy of signalList before delivering mutation records (#518) (Wednesday, 8 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] To notify mutation observers should make a copy of signalList before delivering mutation records (#518) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] When is `slotchange` handler fired? (#515) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Idea: ComposedTreeProxy (#516) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Node.prototype.rootNode is not Web compatible (#241) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Events whose composed flag should be true (#513) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add <a> to safelist of elements that can call attachShadowRoot (#511) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Best practices for styling web components (#510) (Saturday, 4 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Best practices for styling web components (#510) (Saturday, 4 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree? (#504) (Saturday, 4 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Saturday, 4 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Thursday, 2 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] Should custom elements be adoptable if so, how? (#512) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support /deep/ in static profile (bugzilla: 28591) (#78) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Salvador de la Puente González

Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] More clarity around waiting for an active worker to finish (#916) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) (Friday, 17 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Should foreign fetch work same-origin? (#826) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] openWindow with a WebApp manifests (#720) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] consider allowing multiple worker thread instances for a single registration (#756) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] How are unloaded tabs represented? (#626) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Preventing server-forced updates (#822) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Installing a foreign SW as part of a subresource request (#825) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Should foreign fetch work same-origin? (#826) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Allow preventing the update process to finish (#761) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] consider allowing multiple worker thread instances for a single registration (#756) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Introduce `Service-Worker-Max-Age` header (#721) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Never fail for navigation requests (#892) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] consider fetching service worker scripts with no-cache by default (#893) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] what is the best way to save Request while offline ? (#904) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] need AsyncLocalStorage (was #904) (#906) (Monday, 6 June)

Sebastian Markbåge

shans

Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Motion path spec (#66) (Tuesday, 14 June)

Shashank Parekh

Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) (Friday, 17 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) (Friday, 17 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) (Thursday, 16 June)
[slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] service worker not working for localhost (#915) (Thursday, 16 June)
[slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Service worker not working when tested on mobile using local ip. (#914) (Thursday, 16 June)

smaug----

Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [WICG/directory-upload] It is unclear how FormData object gets populated when Upload API is used (#40) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [WICG/directory-upload] It is unclear how FormData object gets populated when Upload API is used (#40) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [WICG/directory-upload] It is unclear how FormData object gets populated when Upload API is used (#40) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/uievents] Figure out what to do with focusin/focusout (#88) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [WICG/directory-upload] It is unclear how FormData object gets populated when Upload API is used (#40) (Sunday, 19 June)
[WICG/directory-upload] It is unclear how FormData object gets populated when Upload API is used (#40) (Sunday, 19 June)
[whatwg/dom] UAs create elements in HTML namespace when context object is an HTML … (#267) (Tuesday, 7 June)
[whatwg/dom] .createElement's namespace handling doesn't seem to match what UAs do (#264) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Change .createElement() namespace to match UAs (#213) (Monday, 6 June)

sourdieselOG

[whatwg/url] https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#idl-index (#129) (Monday, 27 June)

staktrace

Re: [w3c/touch-events] Define interactions with `contextmenu` event? (#68) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/touch-events] Define interactions with `contextmenu` event? (#68) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/touch-events] Define interactions with `contextmenu` event? (#68) (Monday, 27 June)

Steven Lambert

Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Best practices for styling web components (#510) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Best practices for styling web components (#510) (Friday, 3 June)
[w3c/webcomponents] Best practices for styling web components (#510) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Tab Atkins Jr.

Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Define "in the same shadow-including document" (#273) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) (Monday, 6 June)
[whatwg/dom] querySelector/All can accidentally return the scoping element (#263) (Friday, 3 June)

Takayoshi Kochi

Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Friday, 24 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Thursday, 23 June)
[w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Thursday, 23 June)
[w3c/pointerlock] PointerLock and Shadow DOM (#3) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] <iframe> and the History API (#184) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disabling tabindex across potentially many shadow roots (#520) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and requestPointerLock() (#192) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and the Fullscreen API (#180) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Algorithms in 6.3. Sequential Focus Navigation are too complex (#496) (Friday, 3 June)

Takeshi Yoshino

Re: [whatwg/streams] Tweak ReadableByteStreamControllerEnqueue algorithm structure (#473) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Tweak ReadableByteStreamControllerEnqueue algorithm structure (#473) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] tighten ReadableStreamReaderGenericRelease assertion (#466) (Tuesday, 28 June)
[whatwg/streams] Tighten the assertion on the owner stream in ReadableStreamReaderGene… (#472) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] ReadableByteStreamControllerClose accesses first element of pendingPullIntos without checking array length (#470) (Tuesday, 28 June)
[whatwg/streams] Fix pendingPullIntos access in ReadableByteStreamControllerClose() (#471) (Tuesday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Communication between workers/windows via Streams API (#244) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] More concrete examples of "optimization" of pipeTo (#359) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Ensure the JS thread doesn't have to get hit when piping two streams to each other (#97) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] 3.11.4.3. respondWithNewView(view) references `chunk` (#467) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] 3.11.4.3. respondWithNewView(view) references `chunk` (#467) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Synchronous (or asynchronous) state probing on WritableStream (#463) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Synchronous (or asynchronous) state probing on WritableStream (#463) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] autolink fix: Typo of concept-client-hints-list (#314) (Friday, 3 June)
[whatwg/fetch] autolink fix: Typo of concept-client-hints-list (#314) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Align WritableStream structure with ReadableStream structure (#462) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Align WritableStream structure with ReadableStream structure (#462) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Align WritableStream structure with ReadableStream structure (#462) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] [WritableStream] Shouldn't the state after writer.abort() be closed? (#464) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Align WritableStream structure with ReadableStream structure (#462) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] light weight transformations (#461) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Synchronous queue draining for WritableStream (#465) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Align WritableStream structure with ReadableStream structure (#462) (Wednesday, 1 June)
[whatwg/streams] Synchronous queue draining for WritableStream (#465) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Ted Mielczarek

Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/gamepad] `navigator.getGamepads()` should return a `Promise` (#23) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added touched property to GamepadButton (#26) (Tuesday, 21 June)

Till Schneidereit

Re: [whatwg/streams] Convert internal slot accesses in the reference implementation to use symbols (#443) (Monday, 6 June)

Timothy Guan-tin Chien

[whatwg/storage] eTLD -> public suffix? (#33) (Friday, 17 June)
[whatwg/storage] The term "site" is confusing (#32) (Friday, 17 June)

Tobie Langel

Re: [heycam/webidl] Have single number type and allow custom ranges (#14) (Sunday, 19 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] Have single number type and allow custom ranges (#14) (Sunday, 19 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] "Restricted" Float32Array (#126) (Saturday, 18 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] "Restricted" Float32Array (#126) (Saturday, 18 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] Bug (sort of) (#98) (Saturday, 18 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] Bug (sort of) (#98) (Saturday, 18 June)

Tom Van Goethem

[whatwg/storage] Exposing cross-origin resource size (#31) (Friday, 3 June)

Tomek Wytrębowicz

[w3c/uievents] load event details (#92) (Thursday, 30 June)

Tony Trinh

[slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] ServiceWorkerContainer spec lists `onerror` as an event handler (#912) (Tuesday, 14 June)

toriningen

[slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Make ServiceWorkers more tailored for "always offline" websites (#907) (Thursday, 2 June)

Travis Leithead

Re: [w3c/uievents] Probably remove 3.5 -- very redundant with HTML at the moment. (#90) (Friday, 17 June)
[w3c/uievents] Probably remove 3.5 -- very redundant with HTML at the moment. (#90) (Friday, 17 June)
[w3c/DOM-Parsing] Significant normative and editorial updates (#16) (Friday, 17 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] Should probably spec a hasInstance for DOM interface objects (#129) (Wednesday, 15 June)
Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Review FIDO spec (#97) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Special case innerHTML for template parsing; note for outerHTML (#12) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Special case innerHTML for template parsing; note for outerHTML (#12) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Special case innerHTML for template parsing; note for outerHTML (#12) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Special case innerHTML for template parsing; note for outerHTML (#12) (Monday, 6 June)
[w3c/DOM-Parsing] Apply serialization algorithm fixes based on testing (#14) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Document serialization steps are wrong (#11) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Fix document serialization (#13) (Friday, 3 June)
[w3c/DOM-Parsing] Fix document serialization (#13) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] innerHTML needs special case for <template> (#1) (Friday, 3 June)
[w3c/DOM-Parsing] Special case innerHTML for template parsing; note for outerHTML (#12) (Friday, 3 June)
[w3c/DOM-Parsing] Document serialization steps are wrong (#11) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Editorial refactoring (#10) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Test suite link doesn't link to all the relevant tests (#3) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Test suite link doesn't link to all the relevant tests (#3) (Friday, 3 June)
Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Trim unused Respec configuration flags; add additional test suite links (#9) (Friday, 3 June)
[w3c/DOM-Parsing] Editorial refactoring (#10) (Friday, 3 June)
[w3c/DOM-Parsing] Trim unused Respec configuration flags; add additional test suite links (#9) (Friday, 3 June)

Trey Shugart

Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) (Sunday, 26 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Alternative proposal for closed shadow DOM (#499) (Monday, 13 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Monday, 13 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Ability to define Custom Element attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters for those attributes). (#517) (Monday, 13 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Ability to define Custom Element attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters for those attributes). (#517) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] idea: easy way to specify attributes (and optionally enable getters/setters). (#517) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] I find <slot slot="..."> confusing (#514) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree (slotchange)? (#504) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] How can a custom element detect when it is transcluded into a shadow tree? (#504) (Wednesday, 1 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] What happens in these slot/content scenarios? (#508) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Tzviya

Re: [w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) (Wednesday, 22 June)
[w3c/manifest] Define core web manifest to enable extensions (#471) (Monday, 20 June)

vanupam

Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Monday, 27 June)
[whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Monday, 20 June)

Vincent Scheib

Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] Update for Shadow DOM (#4) (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] added a draft for CR revision (#2) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [w3c/pointerlock] added a draft for CR revision (#2) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Shadow DOM and requestPointerLock() (#192) (Thursday, 16 June)

wifiextender

Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Equivalent of Shared Worker Port in Service Worker? (#662) (Tuesday, 14 June)

Xiaoqian Wu

[w3c/pointerlock] added a draft for CR revision (#2) (Friday, 17 June)

Xidorn Quan

Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] root element background propagation issue (#40) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] root element background propagation issue (#40) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Propose to always render elements in the top layer as if it is fixed positioned (#19) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Allow fullscreen to be triggered by an orientation change event (#34) (Wednesday, 29 June)
[w3c/screen-orientation] Timing of triggering change event doesn't look right (#89) (Wednesday, 29 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] root element background propagation issue (#40) (Friday, 17 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] root element background propagation issue (#40) (Friday, 17 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Reserved keyboard shortcut behaviour in fullscreen (#39) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Reserved keyboard shortcut behaviour in fullscreen (#39) (Thursday, 2 June)
Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Reserved keyboard shortcut behaviour in fullscreen (#39) (Thursday, 2 June)

Yehuda Katz

Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)
Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)
[whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Monday, 20 June)

Yoav Weiss

Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Thursday, 30 June)
[slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Enabling multiple Service Workers for a single scope (#921) (Wednesday, 29 June)

youennf

Re: [whatwg/fetch] Mark Accept-* request headers as simple / safe (#326) (Thursday, 23 June)

Yutaka Hirano

Re: [whatwg/fetch] Remove an unused variable (#318) (Tuesday, 7 June)
[whatwg/fetch] Remove an unused variable (#318) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/fetch] Meaningless stream variable assignment (#317) (Tuesday, 7 June)
Re: [whatwg/streams] Synchronous (or asynchronous) state probing on WritableStream (#463) (Tuesday, 7 June)

Yves Lafon

Re: [heycam/webidl] 'Reject' definition. (#73) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [heycam/webidl] 'Reject' definition. (#73) (Wednesday, 22 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] cache.match should create partial responses if given a range request (#913) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] cache.match should create partial responses if given a range request (#913) (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Move service worker spec into w3c (#881) (Friday, 10 June)

Zambonifofex

Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow HTML Element attributes to accept any type of value, not just strings. (#519) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) (Saturday, 11 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) (Saturday, 11 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Declarative syntax for custom elements (#136) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Declarative syntax for custom elements (#136) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Friday, 10 June)
Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Support Custom Pseudo-elements (#300) (Thursday, 9 June)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 June 2016 21:22:41 UTC