Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Progressive Web Apps (#123)

I agree. Examining an aspirational blog post is probably not a great use of the TAG's time. It would be best to maybe revise some of the underlying specs that constitute PWAs instead; as many of those specs have been updated, have spun off new features (e.g., background sync) or are now in some form of "V2". 

> On 7 Jun 2016, at 6:29 AM, Alex Russell <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> 
> I don't understand this issue. There isn't a spec to review, although the TAG was given a preview of all the PWA thinking (and largely what has come to pass) in 2013 and supported it. Also, the TAG weighed in on the relevant specs (SW, Manifest, Permissions, Push, and a few others). What's left?
> 
> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
> 


---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/123#issuecomment-224110748