- From: Jonas Sicking <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 21:34:52 -0700
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2016 04:35:20 UTC
I agree that this makes delete operations on indexes somewhat different than delete operations on objectStores. However I don't think it's awkward or surprising enough behavior that it'll result in website bugs. So I think the fact that there is author demand for this feature, as well as a relatively low cost of implementation, makes it worth adding this feature. Originally we did indeed put this limitation there since the index is a "window" into the objectStore. However I think that we were overly conservative, and updating and deleting objectStores "through" indexes makes authors lives easier enough that we should allow it. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/68#issuecomment-224797884
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2016 04:35:20 UTC