- From: Arthur Stolyar <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 01:37:53 -0700
- To: slightlyoff/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
- Message-ID: <slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/921/229597430@github.com>
Just for the info, if one SW is registered at / scope and second on /scripts/ scope. Then I fetch the /scripts/main.js file. Will browser spawn both SW in the same process or in separate processes? On Jun 30, 2016 11:31 AM, "Yoav Weiss" <notifications@github.com> wrote: > Is this mainly for handling fetches? If so, it feels like a same-origin > foreign fetch. > > I guess you can think of it that way, yeah. > > On the other hand, though, I don't know if spinning up N worker threads > for every network request is a good idea either. > > Can't we run all of them on the same worker thread? At least the use cases > I can think of don't need multiple workers running in parallel. One SW > yields (by calling fetch() or respondWith()) and another takes over. > > — > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/921#issuecomment-229596010>, > or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ABIlkf8YYjKd2OaIhLKuF4shfKx_KYh3ks5qQ37ogaJpZM4JBS5x> > . > --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/921#issuecomment-229597430
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2016 08:38:27 UTC