- From: Jonas Sicking <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:44:34 -0700
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2016 07:45:06 UTC
I do agree that ease of implementation is not an argument for. It was more meant as a "implementation burden is not an argument against in this case". I'm not sure if this is an argument for or against, but even without multiEntry the count can drop by more than one if you do `myindex.delete("a")`. Indexes aren't always unique, so multiple entries in the objectStore can have entries in `myindex` with the key `"a"`. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/68#issuecomment-224822851
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2016 07:45:06 UTC