- From: jan-ivar <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 23:23:26 -0700
- To: w3c/permissions <permissions@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Thursday, 2 June 2016 06:24:20 UTC
@jyasskin I'm fairly sure Chrome's persistent grants are collateral, not per device, FYI. > If a user intended to grant permission temporarily, it seems like we should be discouraging pages from bugging them about it until they express interest in re-granting the permission. Nah. If [appear.in](https://appear.in/alice) bothers Frank, he picks "Never Share". Problem solved. Even for the drive-by web, this is a non-issue in Firefox today, because its door-hangers minimize when ignored, so they're not the nuisance they are in Chrome. Let Chrome fix its UX without requiring spec changes. > Why isn't the right thing for him to do just to grant persistent access? Because he prefers control over when the camera turns on. Please read [the spec](http://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-main/getusermedia.html#privacy-and-security-considerations): *"Authorization may be given on a case-by-case basis, or be persistent."* --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/77#issuecomment-223205777
Received on Thursday, 2 June 2016 06:24:20 UTC