- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 02:22:27 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
- Message-ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/325/r68724399@github.com>
> + Token Binding Id. > + <li><p>If <var>referredTokenBindingId</var> is different from > + <var>providedTokenBindingId</var>, then add <var>referredTokenBindingId</var> as a > + <code title="">referred_token_binding</code> to <var>tokenBindingMessage</var>. > + </ol> > + > + <li><p>If <var>tokenBindingMessage</var> is not <var>null</var>, append a > + <code title="">Sec-Token-Binding</code> header to <var>httpRequest</var>'s > + <span title=concept-request-header-list>header list</span>. > + <p>The value of the <code title="">Sec-Token-Binding</code> header is a > + <var>Token Binding Message</var> as specified in > + <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tokbind-https-03.xml#rfc.section.3">section 2</a> > + of the Token Binding over HTTP spec. > + The value of a Token Binding Message is specified in > + <a href="https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tokbind-protocol-06.xml#rfc.section.3">section 3</a> > + of the Token Binding Protocol spec. This uses various different ways to refer to "token binding message". Are they all supposed to be the same variable? --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/325/files/3c6e385c02263aa186eef6eb4243f51ea5c706cc#r68724399
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2016 09:22:57 UTC