- From: Rick Byers <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:26:19 -0700
- To: w3c/touch-events <touch-events@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2016 19:27:22 UTC
The clearest definition of composed seems to be in the note [here](https://github.com/WICG/IntersectionObserver/blob/gh-pages/explainer.md): > True if event invokes listeners past a ShadowRoot node that is the root of its target attribute value, and false otherwise. I think the general approach (of extending this spec and referring to the WHATWG DOM spec) is fine. When / if we ever go to publish a CR spec we may need to replace the reference to a W3C version, but presumably by then the W3C fork will be updated to also define `composed`. I have a couple questions / concerns with the overall approach though - I'll follow up on the WHATWG issue and circle back here. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/touch-events/pull/67#issuecomment-227545298
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2016 19:27:22 UTC