Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why must the is="" attribute exist? (#509)

Also, like @trusktr said, if this and whatwg/html#896 become a thing, I think it’ll be possible to remove altogether the `extends` property from the `options` argument. We would then write `customElements.define("awesome-button", class extends HTMLButtonElement{}, {})`, which I really like.

Offering this as an alternative to the current way of defining extending native elements — allowing user agent developers and authors to choose which they want to use — is the best solution in my opinion. As @trusktr said, _“I think ‘breaking the web’ might actually fix the web in the long run”_.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/509#issuecomment-225397643