- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 05:38:23 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2016 12:39:03 UTC
```webidl interface DOMTreeConstruction { unsigned long openElement(DOMString name, NamespacePrefix = "html"); void closeElement(); void setAttribute(DOMString name, optional DOMString value = "", optional NamespacePrefix = ""); unsigned long appendText(DOMString text); unsigned long appendComment(DOMString text); Bounds appendHTML(DOMString html); }; enum NamespacePrefix { "", "html", ... }; ``` (Maybe `unsigned long long`?) Spoofing does not matter. That would simply result in an error when the "C++ side" uses the instruction set to create a tree. And since we cannot support rollback and proper transactions anyway due to `<iframe>`, that doesn't seem like a problem. Or at least not one we can solve. I'm not entirely sure what you're saying. The cost to create a promise or a node is equal to creating a number? --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/270#issuecomment-227426663
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2016 12:39:03 UTC