- From: Ian Kilpatrick <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:21:39 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Monday, 20 June 2016 19:22:22 UTC
> But still, it doesn't seem like it should be necessary to implement a feature to discuss general performance implications of the design. Sorry have to disagree with you here. For most APIs proposing a broad-strokes design first is great. However when explicitly proposing a _performance_ API, it should come with the burden of proof (or be obvious) that it will solve the performance problem. Again if bindings isn't really the problem, we could get away with a simpler asyncAppend + WorkerNode design potentially, which is a significantly different API surface. > I can give more information later Yes please! --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/270#issuecomment-227242278
Received on Monday, 20 June 2016 19:22:22 UTC