Re: [slightlyoff/ServiceWorker] Access to fragment identifiers (#854)

> > On the foreign fetch front, there are already cases where the fragment kinda reaches the server, through range requests on media.
>
> Yeah, since it doesn't affect navigation I'm actually inclined to allow this, since it's unlikely fragments for "subresources" have confidential information in them (typically they're just not present). We should maybe open a distinct issue to discuss that though.

Sounds good to me.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/854#issuecomment-224660598