Saturday, 29 December 2012
Friday, 21 December 2012
Thursday, 20 December 2012
Wednesday, 19 December 2012
- Re: next face-to-face meeting: MIT, 11-13 February
- Re: next face-to-face meeting: MIT, 11-13 February
- Re: next face-to-face meeting: MIT, 11-13 February
- Re: next face-to-face meeting: MIT, 11-13 February
- RE: next face-to-face meeting: MIT, 11-13 February
- Re: next face-to-face meeting: MIT, 11-13 February
- Re: next face-to-face meeting: MIT, 11-13 February
- Re: next face-to-face meeting: MIT, 11-13 February
- Re: next face-to-face meeting: MIT, 11-13 February
- Re: next face-to-face meeting: MIT, 11-13 February
- Re: next face-to-face meeting: MIT, 11-13 February
- Re: next face-to-face meeting: MIT, 11-13 February
- RE: next face-to-face meeting: MIT, 11-13 February
- Re: next face-to-face meeting: MIT, 11-13 February
- Re: next face-to-face meeting: MIT, 11-13 February
- next face-to-face meeting: MIT, 11-13 February
Tuesday, 18 December 2012
- RE: Tracking names and emails across sites
- Re: Tracking names and emails across sites
- No DNT call on Wednesday, December 19
- RE: Tracking names and emails across sites
- RE: Tracking names and emails across sites
- Re: Tracking names and emails across sites
- action-323: writing up the results of the 'what are the response header and well-known resource for?' discussion
Monday, 17 December 2012
Thursday, 13 December 2012
- Fw: Tracking names and emails across sites
- action-323: Tom's notes on what is the response header for?
- action-345; Re: action-319: Draft non-normative text on how to accomplish non-JS third parties that want to request for exceptions (with lou)
Wednesday, 12 December 2012
Tuesday, 11 December 2012
- Agenda for December 12, 2012 TPWG call
- Re: RE: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- Service Providers/Outsourcers - detaching the non-normative text (ISSUE-73)
Friday, 7 December 2012
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- RE: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- Re: action-319: Draft non-normative text on how to accomplish non-JS third parties that want to request for exceptions (with lou)
- action to update TPE with the Adrian/Ian proposed text
Thursday, 6 December 2012
- Re: DNT Concerns
- Re: DNT Concerns
- Re: DNT Concerns
- Re: global considerations
- Re: DNT Concerns
- Re: DNT Concerns
- global considerations
- Re: DNT Concerns
- Re: DNT Concerns
- Re: DNT Concerns
- Re: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185
- Re: Priorities
- RE: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- Re: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185
- Re: DNT Concerns
Wednesday, 5 December 2012
- Re: DNT Concerns
- Re: DNT Concerns
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- RE: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- DNT Concerns
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- RE: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185
- Priorities
- ACTION-339: Propose a refinement to debugging permitted use
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- RE: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185
- Re: Request for comments on priorities
- Request for comments on priorities
- RE: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- request for priorities for DNT
- RE: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- RE: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- RE: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- RE: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- RE: Sitecom adds Do Not Track to its routers
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- RE: Sitecom adds Do Not Track to its routers
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- Re: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185
- Re: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185
Tuesday, 4 December 2012
- Re: Agenda for 06 December 2012 TPE call - V01
- Re: ISSUE-138, ACTION-319, exceptions without javascript
- RE: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185
- Re: Sitecom adds Do Not Track to its routers
- Re: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185
- Agenda for 06 December 2012 TPE call - V01
- RE: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185
Monday, 3 December 2012
- Re: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185
- ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185
- RE: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185
- RE: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- Re: Request for comments on priorities for DNT
- RE: Sitecom adds Do Not Track to its routers
- RE: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185
Sunday, 2 December 2012
- RE: ISSUE-187 - What is the right approach to exception handling & ISSUE-185
- Re: Sitecom adds Do Not Track to its routers
- Re: Sitecom adds Do Not Track to its routers
- Re: Sitecom adds Do Not Track to its routers
- Re: Sitecom adds Do Not Track to its routers
- Re: Sitecom adds Do Not Track to its routers
- Re: Sitecom adds Do Not Track to its routers
- Re: Sitecom adds Do Not Track to its routers
Saturday, 1 December 2012
- Re: Sitecom adds Do Not Track to its routers
- Exception revision, following Adrian's and Ian's suggestions
- Re: Sitecom adds Do Not Track to its routers
- Re: Sitecom adds Do Not Track to its routers
- Re: Sitecom adds Do Not Track to its routers
- Re: Sitecom adds Do Not Track to its routers
- RE: Sitecom adds Do Not Track to its routers