- From: David Wainberg <david@networkadvertising.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 10:55:03 -0500
- To: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>
- CC: public-tracking@w3.org
On 12/1/12 8:32 AM, Walter van Holst wrote: > It all comes back to the fundamentally trust-based approach we've taken. > If we assume DNT only to be used by good actors on the server side, we > likewise must assume that a DNT:1 signal has been set in good faith. Walter -- this equivalence is wrong. The incentives are different on either side, so it would make sense to treat them differently in the policy. Isn't that a basic tenet of good policy-making?
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2012 15:55:36 UTC