Re: Sitecom adds Do Not Track to its routers

On 12/1/12 8:32 AM, Walter van Holst wrote:
> It all comes back to the fundamentally trust-based approach we've taken.
> If we assume DNT only to be used by good actors on the server side, we
> likewise must assume that a DNT:1 signal has been set in good faith.
Walter -- this equivalence is wrong. The incentives are different on 
either side, so it would make sense to treat them differently in the 
policy. Isn't that a basic tenet of good policy-making?

Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2012 15:55:36 UTC