Re: DNT Concerns from Walter van Holst on 2012-12-06 (public-tracking@w3.org from December 2012)

From: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 13:40:40 +0100
To: <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <d1b4f35711b71f64ef10547ff553f996@xs4all.nl>

On 2012-12-06 13:08, Alan Chapell wrote:
> Thanks Walter. The regulatory situation you describe below is very
> different from that of other jurisdictions - including the U.S. I 
> believe
> this makes a one size fits all approach to the creation of a DNT
> compliance document problematic.

Alan,

I still quite like Rigo's "Europe should define what DNT:0 means, the 
US what DNT:1 means" approach, which more or less sums up that the 
standard may provide two sizes size which will fit each side of the 
Atlantic rather conveniently. I cannot remember seeing you or any other 
industry representative providing substantial arguments why this can't 
be made to work, provided that all participants are willing to get a 
result after all.

Regards,

  Walter

Received on Thursday, 6 December 2012 12:41:10 UTC