[editorial] RDFa Lite 1.1 needs to say what RDF and RDFa are
Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD
Test 0197 / XHTML+RDFa1.1
Test 0258 / XHTML+RDFa1.1
Test 0121 / Safe Cure [] in @about
ISSUE-139 (Honor xml:base in XHTML5): XHTML5 processing specifically excludes the use of xml:base [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
Test Case 0109 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1
Test Case 0090 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1
Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1
Request to advance RDFa 1.1 to Proposed Recommendation
Re: Updated RDFa Lite 1.1 draft
Official Response to ISSUE-138 from RDF Web Apps WG
Official Response to ISSUE-136 from RDF Web Apps WG
Official Response to ISSUE-134 from RDF Web Apps WG
ISSUE-138: Fix regexp in the xsd:simpleType definition of CURIE (it's too lax, matching e.g. "pfx://abc")
Re: Official Response to ISSUE-132 from RDF Web Apps WG
Re: Official Response to ISSUE-130 from RDF Web Apps WG
Minor editorial fix needed in rdfa-core - section 7.4.3
ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
- Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
- Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
- Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
- Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
- Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
- Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
- Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
- Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?]
- Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?]
ISSUE-136 (RDFa Lite conformance): RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments]
ISSUE-135 (html5 rel values): RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values
- Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values
- Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values
RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes
- Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136)
- Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136)
ISSUE-134 (processing step clarification): Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1 [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments]
- Re: ISSUE-134 (processing step clarification): Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1 [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments]
- RE: ISSUE-134 (processing step clarification): Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1 [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments]
Update EARL reports
Telecon Agenda - April 26th 2012, 1500 UTC
Publish RDFa Primer as a Working Draft?
- Re: Publish RDFa Primer as a Working Draft?
- Re: Publish RDFa Primer as a Working Draft?
- Re: Publish RDFa Primer as a Working Draft?
- Re: Publish RDFa Primer as a Working Draft?
RDFa Lite and typeof influence
Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1
Re: Error in test or error in spec? ISSUE-133
Word list for Glossary
Experimental RDFa extractor in JS
- Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS
- Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS
- Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS
Biderectionally marking authorship/ownership of a page
Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design
Fwd: advice on TR URI-s
clj-rdfa, Jena and vocabulary expansion
Processing "incomplete triples" when direction is "none"
- RE: Processing "incomplete triples" when direction is "none"
- Re: Processing "incomplete triples" when direction is "none"