- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:53:24 -0400
- To: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- CC: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Apr 27, 2012, at 2:25 PM, Alex Milowski wrote: > ...and 0081, and 0082. It is the same markup structure repeated over > again in slightly different situations. :) 0248: "multiple ways of handling incomplete triples (with @rev); RDFa 1.1 version" 0249: "multiple ways of handling incomplete triples (with @rel and @rev); RDFa 1.1 version" Gregg > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote: >> It looks like tet 0078 has the same issue. >> >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote: >>> I've been looking at Test Case 0058 for XHTML+RDFa 1.1 and I found this e-mail: >>> >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2012Feb/0012.html >>> >>> It looks like this test case has not been changed. > > > -- > --Alex Milowski > "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the > inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language > considered." > > Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics >
Received on Friday, 27 April 2012 23:54:03 UTC