Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] from Dan Brickley on 2012-04-25 (public-rdfa-wg@w3.org from April 2012)

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:33:34 +0200
To: Grant Robertson <grantsr@gmail.com>
Cc: RDFa Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAFfrAFquw-Mdacpd0zo7NeLJ1G4H24hhbqFGmp3kWeGG5-YVWQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 25 April 2012 22:58, Grant Robertson <grantsr@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dan,
>
> That would require a complete rewrite of RDF 1.1 Core. The whole purpose of
> @property emulating @rel in special cases (what I call "Special Property
> Mode") is to allow similar behavior but without chaining. To strip @rel from
> RDFa would eliminate chaining. To restore that chaining, but without @rel,
> would require a major rethink in the algorithm.

I wasn't suggesting anything, I was asking a question about use of the
existing design.

Dan

Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 22:34:03 UTC