Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values

On Apr 25, 2012, at 18:28 , Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>> ---
>> Gregg, you essentially proposed to remove @rel from the effect of @vocab in HTML5+RDFa. This is, in my view, really throwing the baby out with the bath water at this point. We know that there are genuine use case for the usage of @rel (beyond  RDFa Lite) and I cannot simply explain to any user why @vocab would become unusable for that. It would make @vocab much less usable.
> Yes, this was sort of a "Thermo-Nuclear" option, that does go too far, but is in keeping with RDFa 1.1 Lite principles.

To be clear: this options, or similar, would be valid for HTML5+RDFa and _not_ restricted to RDFa Lite, right?


Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
mobile: +31-641044153

Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 11:55:51 UTC