W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:38:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CABp3FNJ62CMmNyJ6SO3=42PM+eSPB4LzfHDMgh+EtMEZkUBbSw@mail.gmail.com>
To: RDF Web Applications Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote:
> I doubt there is a reliable way to tell them apart.

...or, I'm wrong and we do explicitly what the HTML+RDFa 1.1
specification says and if there is a version attribute with the value
"XHTML+RDFa 1.1", we use the that instead.  By default, you'd process
with the HTML+RDFa 1.1 rules.  That means all documents served as
application/xhtml+xml that conform to the HTML5 specification (e.g. no
version attribute) would be processed according to the HTML+RDFa 1.1

--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 23:39:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:05:31 UTC