public-rdfa-wg@w3.org from April 2012 by date

Monday, 30 April 2012

• [editorial] RDFa Lite 1.1 needs to say what RDF and RDFa are Liam R E Quin
• Re: Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD Manu Sporny
• Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD Manu Sporny

Saturday, 28 April 2012

• Re: Test 0197 / XHTML+RDFa1.1 Gregg Kellogg
• Re: ISSUE-139 (Honor xml:base in XHTML5): XHTML5 processing specifically excludes the use of xml:base [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Ivan Herman
• Re: Test 0197 / XHTML+RDFa1.1 Alex Milowski
• Re: Test 0197 / XHTML+RDFa1.1 Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Test 0258 / XHTML+RDFa1.1 Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Test 0121 / Safe Cure [] in @about Gregg Kellogg
• Test 0197 / XHTML+RDFa1.1 Alex Milowski
• Test 0258 / XHTML+RDFa1.1 Alex Milowski
• Re: Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Alex Milowski
• Re: Test 0121 / Safe Cure [] in @about Alex Milowski
• Re: Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Test 0121 / Safe Cure [] in @about Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Test Case 0090 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Alex Milowski
• Re: Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Alex Milowski
• Test 0121 / Safe Cure [] in @about Alex Milowski
• Re: Test Case 0109 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (ISSUE-139) Gregg Kellogg

Friday, 27 April 2012

• ISSUE-139 (Honor xml:base in XHTML5): XHTML5 processing specifically excludes the use of xml:base [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Test Case 0090 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Gregg Kellogg
• Test Case 0109 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Alex Milowski
• Test Case 0090 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Alex Milowski
• Re: Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Alex Milowski
• Re: Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Alex Milowski
• Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Alex Milowski
• Request to advance RDFa 1.1 to Proposed Recommendation Manu Sporny
• Re: Updated RDFa Lite 1.1 draft Manu Sporny
• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-138 from RDF Web Apps WG Niklas Lindström
• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-136 from RDF Web Apps WG Alex Milowski
• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-134 from RDF Web Apps WG Alex Milowski
• Official Response to ISSUE-138 from RDF Web Apps WG Manu Sporny
• Official Response to ISSUE-136 from RDF Web Apps WG Manu Sporny
• Official Response to ISSUE-134 from RDF Web Apps WG Manu Sporny
• Re: ISSUE-135 (html5 rel values): RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Alex Milowski
• RE: ISSUE-135 (html5 rel values): RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Grant Robertson

Thursday, 26 April 2012

• Re: Word list for Glossary Sebastian Heath
• Re: Word list for Glossary Niklas Lindström
• Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Niklas Lindström
• Re: ISSUE-138: Fix regexp in the xsd:simpleType definition of CURIE (it's too lax, matching e.g. "pfx://abc") Shane McCarron
• ISSUE-138: Fix regexp in the xsd:simpleType definition of CURIE (it's too lax, matching e.g. "pfx://abc") RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] Alex Milowski
• Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Alex Milowski
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Gregg Kellogg
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Ivan Herman
• Re: Minor editorial fix needed in rdfa-core - section 7.4.3 Ivan Herman
• Re: Is RDFa Lite a subset of RDFa Core or is it meant to be a separate standard? Gregg Kellogg
• Is RDFa Lite a subset of RDFa Core or is it meant to be a separate standard? Grant Robertson
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] Ivan Herman
• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-132 from RDF Web Apps WG Manu Sporny
• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-130 from RDF Web Apps WG Manu Sporny
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Manu Sporny
• Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Alex Milowski
• Minor editorial fix needed in rdfa-core - section 7.4.3 Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Gregg Kellogg

Wednesday, 25 April 2012

• Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Alex Milowski
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] Niklas Lindström
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] Niklas Lindström
• Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Alex Milowski
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] Gregg Kellogg
• ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] Alex Milowski
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] Alex Milowski
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] Grant Robertson
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] Gregg Kellogg
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] Alex Milowski
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Gregg Kellogg
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Gregg Kellogg
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Alex Milowski
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Ivan Herman
• Re: Re 2: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Alex Milowski
• Re: Re 2: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: ISSUE-134 (processing step clarification): Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1 [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments] Alex Milowski
• Re 2: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Ivan Herman
• RE: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Grant Robertson
• RE: ISSUE-134 (processing step clarification): Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1 [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments] Grant Robertson

Tuesday, 24 April 2012

• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Alex Milowski
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Alex Milowski
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Alex Milowski
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Gregg Kellogg
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Alex Milowski
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Gregg Kellogg
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Alex Milowski
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Alex Milowski
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) Alex Milowski
• Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) Shane McCarron
• Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) Alex Milowski
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Alex Milowski
• Re: Telecon Agenda - April 26th 2012, 1500 UTC Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: Telecon Agenda - April 26th 2012, 1500 UTC Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) Ivan Herman
• ISSUE-136 (RDFa Lite conformance): RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments] RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-135 (html5 rel values): RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Ivan Herman
• RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: Update EARL reports Gregg Kellogg

Monday, 23 April 2012

• RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes Alex Milowski
• Re: Telecon Agenda - April 26th 2012, 1500 UTC Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-134 (processing step clarification): Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1 [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments] Ivan Herman
• ISSUE-134 (processing step clarification): Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1 [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments] RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1 Ivan Herman
• Re: Publish RDFa Primer as a Working Draft? Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Publish RDFa Primer as a Working Draft? Grant Robertson
• Update EARL reports Gregg Kellogg

Sunday, 22 April 2012

• Re: Publish RDFa Primer as a Working Draft? Niklas Lindström
• Re: Publish RDFa Primer as a Working Draft? Shane McCarron
• Telecon Agenda - April 26th 2012, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny
• Publish RDFa Primer as a Working Draft? Manu Sporny

Saturday, 21 April 2012

• Re: Error in test or error in spec? ISSUE-133 Ivan Herman

Friday, 20 April 2012

• Re: RDFa Lite and typeof influence Gregg Kellogg
• Re: RDFa Lite and typeof influence Stéphane Corlosquet
• Re: RDFa Lite and typeof influence Alex Milowski
• Re: RDFa Lite and typeof influence Gregg Kellogg
• RDFa Lite and typeof influence Alex Milowski
• Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1 Alex Milowski
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? ISSUE-133 Alex Milowski
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS Niklas Lindström
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS Niklas Lindström
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS Niklas Lindström
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS Ivan Herman
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS Niklas Lindström
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS Niklas Lindström
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS Niklas Lindström
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS Henri Bergius
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS Ivan Herman
• Word list for Glossary Grant Robertson
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS Gregg Kellogg

Thursday, 19 April 2012

• Experimental RDFa extractor in JS Niklas Lindström
• Biderectionally marking authorship/ownership of a page M. L. Giannotta

Tuesday, 10 April 2012

• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design Ivan Herman
• Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design Ivan Herman

Monday, 9 April 2012

• Re: clj-rdfa, Jena and vocabulary expansion Niklas Lindström
• Re: Fwd: advice on TR URI-s Shane McCarron
• Fwd: advice on TR URI-s Ivan Herman
• Re: clj-rdfa, Jena and vocabulary expansion Gregg Kellogg
• Re: clj-rdfa, Jena and vocabulary expansion Ivan Herman
• clj-rdfa, Jena and vocabulary expansion Niklas Lindström
• Re: Processing "incomplete triples" when direction is "none" Gregg Kellogg
• RE: Processing "incomplete triples" when direction is "none" Grant Robertson
• Processing "incomplete triples" when direction is "none" Grant Robertson

Sunday, 8 April 2012

• Re: Updated RDFa 1.1 Core editor's draft Ivan Herman

Saturday, 7 April 2012

• RE: Updated RDFa 1.1 Core editor's draft Grant Robertson

Friday, 6 April 2012

• Re: Updated RDFa 1.1 Core editor's draft Ivan Herman
• Re: Updated RDFa 1.1 Core editor's draft Ivan Herman
• RE: Updated RDFa 1.1 Core editor's draft Grant Robertson

Thursday, 5 April 2012

• Re: Updated RDFa 1.1 Core editor's draft Gregg Kellogg
• Updated RDFa 1.1 Core editor's draft Ivan Herman
• Re: [REVISED] Telecon Agenda - April 5th 2012, 1500 UTC Ivan Herman
• [REVISED] Telecon Agenda - April 5th 2012, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny
• Re: Which CURIE specification should one build on? Gregg Kellogg

Wednesday, 4 April 2012

• Which CURIE specification should one build on? Christoph LANGE
• Re: RDFa Subject-Object Variables Determination Grant Robertson
• RE: XML+RDFa Document Conformance Shane McCarron

Tuesday, 3 April 2012

• RE: XML+RDFa Document Conformance Grant Robertson
• Re: 'no prefix' mapping vs. @vocab Shane McCarron
• Re: XML+RDFa Document Conformance Shane McCarron
• Workshop IHM Workshop IHM
• 'no prefix' mapping vs. @vocab Grant Robertson
• XML+RDFa Document Conformance Grant Robertson
• Progress Update on my RDFa-processing grokking-process. Grant Robertson

Monday, 2 April 2012

• Please remove me from the list Tom Adamich
• Re 2: Telecon Agenda - April 5th 2012, 1500 UTC Ivan Herman
• Re: Updated the primer Ivan Herman
• Re: Telecon Agenda - April 5th 2012, 1500 UTC Ivan Herman
• Telecon Agenda - April 5th 2012, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny

Last message date: Monday, 30 April 2012 23:30:43 UTC