public-rdfa-wg@w3.org from April 2012 by author

Alex Milowski

• Re: Test 0197 / XHTML+RDFa1.1 (Saturday, 28 April)
• Test 0197 / XHTML+RDFa1.1 (Saturday, 28 April)
• Test 0258 / XHTML+RDFa1.1 (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: Test 0121 / Safe Cure [] in @about (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: Test Case 0090 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (Saturday, 28 April)
• Test 0121 / Safe Cure [] in @about (Saturday, 28 April)
• Test Case 0109 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (Friday, 27 April)
• Test Case 0090 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (Friday, 27 April)
• Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-136 from RDF Web Apps WG (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-134 from RDF Web Apps WG (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: ISSUE-135 (html5 rel values): RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: ISSUE-134 (processing step clarification): Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1 [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments] (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Tuesday, 24 April)
• RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and typeof influence (Friday, 20 April)
• RDFa Lite and typeof influence (Friday, 20 April)
• Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1 (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? ISSUE-133 (Friday, 20 April)

Christoph LANGE

• Which CURIE specification should one build on? (Wednesday, 4 April)

Dan Brickley

• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Tuesday, 24 April)

Grant Robertson

• RE: ISSUE-135 (html5 rel values): RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Friday, 27 April)
• Is RDFa Lite a subset of RDFa Core or is it meant to be a separate standard? (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] (Wednesday, 25 April)
• RE: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Wednesday, 25 April)
• RE: ISSUE-134 (processing step clarification): Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1 [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments] (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Publish RDFa Primer as a Working Draft? (Monday, 23 April)
• Word list for Glossary (Friday, 20 April)
• RE: Processing "incomplete triples" when direction is "none" (Monday, 9 April)
• Processing "incomplete triples" when direction is "none" (Monday, 9 April)
• RE: Updated RDFa 1.1 Core editor's draft (Saturday, 7 April)
• RE: Updated RDFa 1.1 Core editor's draft (Friday, 6 April)
• Re: RDFa Subject-Object Variables Determination (Wednesday, 4 April)
• RE: XML+RDFa Document Conformance (Tuesday, 3 April)
• 'no prefix' mapping vs. @vocab (Tuesday, 3 April)
• XML+RDFa Document Conformance (Tuesday, 3 April)
• Progress Update on my RDFa-processing grokking-process. (Tuesday, 3 April)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: Test 0197 / XHTML+RDFa1.1 (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: Test 0197 / XHTML+RDFa1.1 (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: Test 0258 / XHTML+RDFa1.1 (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: Test 0121 / Safe Cure [] in @about (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: Test 0121 / Safe Cure [] in @about (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: Test Case 0109 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (ISSUE-139) (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: Test Case 0090 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1 (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: Is RDFa Lite a subset of RDFa Core or is it meant to be a separate standard? (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Update EARL reports (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Publish RDFa Primer as a Working Draft? (Monday, 23 April)
• Update EARL reports (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and typeof influence (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and typeof influence (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: clj-rdfa, Jena and vocabulary expansion (Monday, 9 April)
• Re: Processing "incomplete triples" when direction is "none" (Monday, 9 April)
• Re: Updated RDFa 1.1 Core editor's draft (Thursday, 5 April)
• Re: Which CURIE specification should one build on? (Thursday, 5 April)

Henri Bergius

• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS (Friday, 20 April)

Ivan Herman

• Re: ISSUE-139 (Honor xml:base in XHTML5): XHTML5 processing specifically excludes the use of xml:base [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: Minor editorial fix needed in rdfa-core - section 7.4.3 (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Re 2: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re 2: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - April 26th 2012, 1500 UTC (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - April 26th 2012, 1500 UTC (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: ISSUE-134 (processing step clarification): Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1 [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments] (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1 (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: Error in test or error in spec? ISSUE-133 (Saturday, 21 April)
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Fwd: advice on TR URI-s (Monday, 9 April)
• Re: clj-rdfa, Jena and vocabulary expansion (Monday, 9 April)
• Re: Updated RDFa 1.1 Core editor's draft (Sunday, 8 April)
• Re: Updated RDFa 1.1 Core editor's draft (Friday, 6 April)
• Re: Updated RDFa 1.1 Core editor's draft (Friday, 6 April)
• Updated RDFa 1.1 Core editor's draft (Thursday, 5 April)
• Re: [REVISED] Telecon Agenda - April 5th 2012, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 5 April)
• Re 2: Telecon Agenda - April 5th 2012, 1500 UTC (Monday, 2 April)
• Re: Updated the primer (Monday, 2 April)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - April 5th 2012, 1500 UTC (Monday, 2 April)

Liam R E Quin

• [editorial] RDFa Lite 1.1 needs to say what RDF and RDFa are (Monday, 30 April)

M. L. Giannotta

• Biderectionally marking authorship/ownership of a page (Thursday, 19 April)

Manu Sporny

• Re: Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD (Monday, 30 April)
• Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD (Monday, 30 April)
• Request to advance RDFa 1.1 to Proposed Recommendation (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: Updated RDFa Lite 1.1 draft (Friday, 27 April)
• Official Response to ISSUE-138 from RDF Web Apps WG (Friday, 27 April)
• Official Response to ISSUE-136 from RDF Web Apps WG (Friday, 27 April)
• Official Response to ISSUE-134 from RDF Web Apps WG (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-132 from RDF Web Apps WG (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-130 from RDF Web Apps WG (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Thursday, 26 April)
• Telecon Agenda - April 26th 2012, 1500 UTC (Sunday, 22 April)
• Publish RDFa Primer as a Working Draft? (Sunday, 22 April)
• [REVISED] Telecon Agenda - April 5th 2012, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 5 April)
• Telecon Agenda - April 5th 2012, 1500 UTC (Monday, 2 April)

Niklas Lindström

• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-138 from RDF Web Apps WG (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: Word list for Glossary (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?] (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Publish RDFa Primer as a Working Draft? (Sunday, 22 April)
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: Experimental RDFa extractor in JS (Friday, 20 April)
• Experimental RDFa extractor in JS (Thursday, 19 April)
• Re: clj-rdfa, Jena and vocabulary expansion (Monday, 9 April)
• clj-rdfa, Jena and vocabulary expansion (Monday, 9 April)

RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-139 (Honor xml:base in XHTML5): XHTML5 processing specifically excludes the use of xml:base [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Friday, 27 April)
• ISSUE-138: Fix regexp in the xsd:simpleType definition of CURIE (it's too lax, matching e.g. "pfx://abc") (Thursday, 26 April)
• ISSUE-137 (Media Type): HTML+RDFa should normatively declare media types and describe how to identify relative to XHTML+RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Wednesday, 25 April)
• ISSUE-136 (RDFa Lite conformance): RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments] (Tuesday, 24 April)
• ISSUE-135 (html5 rel values): RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] (Tuesday, 24 April)
• ISSUE-134 (processing step clarification): Section 7.5, Step 11 Ambiguity in RDFa Core 1.1 [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments] (Monday, 23 April)

Sebastian Heath

• Re: Word list for Glossary (Thursday, 26 April)

Shane McCarron

• Re: ISSUE-138: Fix regexp in the xsd:simpleType definition of CURIE (it's too lax, matching e.g. "pfx://abc") (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Publish RDFa Primer as a Working Draft? (Sunday, 22 April)
• Re: Fwd: advice on TR URI-s (Monday, 9 April)
• RE: XML+RDFa Document Conformance (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: 'no prefix' mapping vs. @vocab (Tuesday, 3 April)
• Re: XML+RDFa Document Conformance (Tuesday, 3 April)

Stéphane Corlosquet

• Minor editorial fix needed in rdfa-core - section 7.4.3 (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: Re 2: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Telecon Agenda - April 26th 2012, 1500 UTC (Tuesday, 24 April)
• RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: RDFa Lite and typeof influence (Friday, 20 April)

Tom Adamich

• Please remove me from the list (Monday, 2 April)

Workshop IHM

• Workshop IHM (Tuesday, 3 April)

Last message date: Monday, 30 April 2012 23:30:43 UTC