Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Gregg Kellogg <> wrote:
> Perhaps the way to address unwanted @rel terms expanding because of @vocab is simply to say that, for HTML+RDFa, @vocab is not used to turn terms into IRIs, and so anything that's not a defined term causes the @rel to be dropped.
> This only affects HTML+RDFa 1.1, so does not address a CR change to RDFa 1.1 Core.

Wouldn't that mean we'd have to specify changes to the sequence
algorithm in the HTML+RDFa 1.1. specification?  Right now, everything
is nicely separated and the HTML+RDFa 1.1. specification just sets up
an initial context.

--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics

Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 18:28:20 UTC