- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:27:46 -0700
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > Perhaps the way to address unwanted @rel terms expanding because of @vocab is simply to say that, for HTML+RDFa, @vocab is not used to turn terms into IRIs, and so anything that's not a defined term causes the @rel to be dropped. > > This only affects HTML+RDFa 1.1, so does not address a CR change to RDFa 1.1 Core. Wouldn't that mean we'd have to specify changes to the sequence algorithm in the HTML+RDFa 1.1. specification? Right now, everything is nicely separated and the HTML+RDFa 1.1. specification just sets up an initial context. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 18:28:20 UTC