Re: Error in test or error in spec? ISSUE-133

Alex,

I am on a full-day meeting today, then travel, so I cannot go into details right now. But the best is if you look at the latest editor's draft for Core, which has these changes in them

http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-core/Overview-src.html

Ivan
On Apr 20, 2012, at 20:26 , Alex Milowski wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:42 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>> 
>> What did was:
>> 
>> - created a separate 'product' in the tracker for CR comments
>> - added this issue, so that we can properly track it
>> - I have made the editorial changes on the recspec version *on my machine*. Shane, I am not 100% sure what your workflow is for the CR publication (next Tuesday), so I did not want to commit this on CVS. Please tell me how to proceed...
>> 
> 
> I would love to see these changes.  Can you cut-n-paste your proposed
> text into an e-mail?
> 
> I just ran into this problem today testing my RDFa implementation and
> came to similar, but not completely the same, conclusions.  It seems
> to me that the specification needs at least to say that the "typed
> resource" is set to the value of the "new subject" established from
> the @about attribute's presence.  That can simply be stated by adding
> a bullet to the second part of 5.1 about the typed resource that says:
> 
>  * otherwise, by using the IRI from @about, if present ....
> 
> but I'm not following why the current object resource should not be
> set.  Do we have an example that demonstrates why that should not be
> set when @about and @typeof co-occur?
> 
> 
> -- 
> --Alex Milowski
> "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
> inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
> considered."
> 
> Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf