- From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:37:41 -0700
- To: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > On Apr 27, 2012, at 5:17 PM, Alex Milowski wrote: > >> So, should these tests be fixed or skipped? > > We still run RDFa 1.0 tests to determine processor validity. Many processors implement both RDFa 1.0 and 1.1, although that will be of decreasing value over time. > > If you look at the test suite, you'll see that you can set the version to either 1.0 or 1.1 (and 1.1 with vocabulary expansion). Doing so shows a different set of tests. > > For your purposes, you should just run those that are for rdfa1.1. Yes, based on your previous e-mail, I've changed my use of the manifest.json to just use the rdfa1.1 tests. As such, these have become a non-issue. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Saturday, 28 April 2012 00:38:10 UTC