Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting
Position of the WG wrt opacity of IRIs and singleton property semantics
Extending the baseline with "asserted" stuff - syntax & semantics
Syntax for reifier declarations
triple terms are not a universal panacea
last call for use cases from the working group
- Re: last call for use cases from the working group
- last call for use cases from the working group (with fixed link)
RDF-star WG biweekly meeting @ Thu, Jul 25, 2024 9:00am – 9:55am (GMT-07)
Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting
- AW: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting
- Re: [External] : Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting
Proposal: described vs stated triple terms
- Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms
- Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms
- Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms
- Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms
- Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms
- Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms
Translating Property Graphs with Multiple Labels to RDF-sta
- Re: Translating Property Graphs with Multiple Labels to RDF-sta
- Re: Translating Property Graphs with Multiple Labels to RDF-sta
Proposal by Kurt
Let's move on: open issues about the syntax and semantics of the baseline
Naming convention
URL for the working version of the baseline
RDF star and LPGs
- Re: RDF star and LPGs
- Re: RDF star and LPGs
Event Invitation: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting
Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting
Proposal for RDF-star Minimal Baseline - Agenda item for this week's plenary
- Re: Proposal for RDF-star Minimal Baseline - Agenda item for this week's plenary
- Re: Proposal for RDF-star Minimal Baseline - Agenda item for this week's plenary
RDF is a framework, not a vocabulary
- Re: RDF is a framework, not a vocabulary
- Re: RDF is a framework, not a vocabulary
Regrets for today's meeting
Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting
Event Invitation: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting
summary un/asserted
I’ll join a bit later today
Sem/UC TF meeting on Friday, 5.7.2024?
Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline]
- Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline]
- Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline]
- Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline]
- Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline]
- Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline]
- Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline]
- Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline]
- Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline]