Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms from Franconi Enrico on 2024-07-25 (public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org from July 2024)

From: Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 14:32:16 +0000
To: Thomas Lörtsch <tl@rat.io>
CC: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>, "public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org" <public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6FCAD9E3-29A6-4F80-9893-0BE4B6A49902@inf.unibz.it>



> On 25 Jul 2024, at 16:29, Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it> wrote:
> 
> On 25 Jul 2024, at 16:21, Thomas Lörtsch <tl@rat.io> wrote:
>> 
>>> I said that a reifier denotes an existing resource in the graph.
>>> A reifier reifies a triple term, and it represents the induced resource by the triple term.
>> 
>> can you please define "induce"? is that term in any way related to "entail"?
> 
> Uh? No, obviously in our context: “the resource reified by the triple term”.

Ops, autocorrect error: reified by —> reifying”


> —e.

Received on Thursday, 25 July 2024 14:32:22 UTC