Re: [External] : Re: new proposal

On 02/07/2024 05:45, Souripriya Das wrote:
> The following type of nesting allows reifying the association between a 
> reifier and what it reifies:
>          :r2 rdf:reifies  <<( :r1 rdf:reifies <<( :s :p :o )>> )>> .
> Here the nesting is: "rdf;reifies -> rdf:reifies" (i.e., in the ordering 
> of predicates, rdf:reifies immediately follows another rdf:reifies).
> 
> Nested beliefs are different than above and can be expressed as follows:
> Using 4^th  component as the reifier:
>          :s :p :o :r1 .
>          :bob :believes :r1 :r2 .
>          :alice :believes :r2 .
> The same can be expressed using rdf:reifies as follows:
>          :r1 rdf:reifies <<( :earth :hasShape :cube )>> .
>          :r2 rdf:reifies <<( :bob :believes :r1 )>> .
>          :alice :believes :r2 .

We can have a standalone clause in the "agreed syntax" to have a 
standalone reification in consistent style with inline use:

<< :r1 | :earth :hasShape :cube >> .

     Andy

https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star-wg/2024Jan/0095.html

Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2024 10:34:46 UTC