public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org from July 2024 by subject

[External] : Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting

[External] : Re: new proposal

[External] : Re: RDF is a framework, not a vocabulary

[External] : Re: RDF star and LPGs

[w3c/rdf-turtle] Grammar updates for triple terms and occurrences. (PR #51)

AW: Event Invitation: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting

AW: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting

AW: RDF star and LPGs

AW: Regrets for today's meeting

Event Invitation: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting

Event Invitation: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting

Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting

Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting

Extending the baseline with "asserted" stuff - syntax & semantics

I’ll join a bit later today

last call for use cases from the working group

last call for use cases from the working group (with fixed link)

Let's move on: open issues about the syntax and semantics of the baseline

LPG and RDF differences (Was Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms)

Naming convention

new proposal

Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline]

Position of the WG wrt opacity of IRIs and singleton property semantics

Proposal by Kurt

Proposal for RDF-star Minimal Baseline - Agenda item for this week's plenary

Proposal: described vs stated triple terms

RDF is a framework, not a vocabulary

RDF star and LPGs

RDF-star WG biweekly meeting @ Thu, Jul 25, 2024 9:00am – 9:55am (GMT-07)

Regrets for today's meeting

Sem/UC TF meeting on Friday, 5.7.2024?

summary un/asserted

Syntax for reifier declarations

Translating Property Graphs with Multiple Labels to RDF-sta

triple terms are not a universal panacea

URL for the working version of the baseline

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 July 2024 22:16:15 UTC