Re: summary un/asserted

On 9 Jul 2024, at 17:01, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:

A big problem (and one reason that I don't totally believe this proposal) is using the same IRI or blank node for multiple triple occurrences as in
 <:x< :a :b :c >> :d :e .
 <:x< :f :g :h >> :d :e .
has to be handled by either forbidding it or allowing a node to have multiple triple occurrences.

Ok, groundhog day every week: I thought we accepted once and for all the fact that we *should* allow a node to have multiple triple occurrences, as per baseline <https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/wiki/RDF-star-%22minimal-baseline%22>, in order to capture important use cases (not capitalised).
—e.