Re: Sem/UC TF meeting on Friday, 5.7.2024?

thanks, enrico!

but no, i don't get those emails. seems like i'm not on the list of tf participants

best 
thomas 

Am 4. Juli 2024 16:44:36 MESZ schrieb Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it>:
>Didn’t you get the email? The meeting is confirmed.
>—e.
>
>> On 4 Jul 2024, at 16:32, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Thomas, all,
>> 
>> I'll be there if the meeting isn't cancelled.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Niklas
>> 
>> On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 11:54 AM Thomas Lörtsch <tl@rat.io> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi there,
>>> 
>>> will we have a Semantics/Use Cases TF meeting tomorrow? I'd like to continue the discussion about unasserted assertions from last Friday.
>>> 
>>> In a reply to Niklas from Monday [0] I Iayed out in some detail why I think that there is a serious problem with the current proposals and how I think it can be solved. Slight modification to [0]: it occurred to me that the two different versions of syntactic sugar for asserted and unasserted occurrence terms, eg <<... >> and <<<... >>>, need to be mapped to two different primitives in gofo RDF: asserted occurrences need to be mapped to n-ary relations (qualifying the assertion), but unasserted occurrences (unlike what I propose in [0]) should be mapped to standard reification.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Thomas
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [0] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star-wg/2024Jul/0002.html
>> 
>