public-rdf-star-wg@w3.org from July 2024 by author

Adrian Gschwend

• Proposal for RDF-star Minimal Baseline - Agenda item for this week's plenary (Tuesday, 16 July)

Adrian Gschwend (W3C Calendar)

• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Event Invitation: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Tuesday, 16 July)
• Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Event Invitation: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting (Wednesday, 10 July)

Andy Seaborne

• Syntax for reifier declarations (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: RDF star and LPGs (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: Sem/UC TF meeting on Friday, 5.7.2024? (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: new proposal (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: new proposal (Tuesday, 2 July)

Antoine Zimmermann

• Re: AW: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting (Thursday, 25 July)
• Regrets for today's meeting (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline] (Monday, 1 July)

Dave Richardson

• Re: triple terms are not a universal panacea (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Wednesday, 10 July)

ddooss@wp.pl

• Re: Translating Property Graphs with Multiple Labels to RDF-sta (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Translating Property Graphs with Multiple Labels to RDF-sta (Tuesday, 23 July)

Doerthe Arndt

• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Re: Proposal for RDF-star Minimal Baseline - Agenda item for this week's plenary (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: Proposal for RDF-star Minimal Baseline - Agenda item for this week's plenary (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: Proposal for RDF-star Minimal Baseline - Agenda item for this week's plenary (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: Proposal for RDF-star Minimal Baseline - Agenda item for this week's plenary (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Tuesday, 9 July)

Erich Bremer

• Re: last call for use cases from the working group (Thursday, 25 July)

Franconi Enrico

• Re: Proposal by Kurt (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Re: Proposal by Kurt (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Position of the WG wrt opacity of IRIs and singleton property semantics (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Extending the baseline with "asserted" stuff - syntax & semantics (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Re: Proposal by Kurt (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Proposal by Kurt (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Proposal by Kurt (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Proposal by Kurt (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: RDF star and LPGs (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Translating Property Graphs with Multiple Labels to RDF-sta (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: Translating Property Graphs with Multiple Labels to RDF-sta (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Proposal by Kurt (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: RDF star and LPGs (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: RDF star and LPGs (Monday, 22 July)
• Let's move on: open issues about the syntax and semantics of the baseline (Monday, 22 July)
• Naming convention (Monday, 22 July)
• URL for the working version of the baseline (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: RDF star and LPGs (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: Proposal for RDF-star Minimal Baseline - Agenda item for this week's plenary (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Tuesday, 9 July)
• I’ll join a bit later today (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: Sem/UC TF meeting on Friday, 5.7.2024? (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: new proposal (Monday, 1 July)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: [w3c/rdf-turtle] Grammar updates for triple terms and occurrences. (PR #51) (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: last call for use cases from the working group (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: RDF is a framework, not a vocabulary (Friday, 12 July)

Gregory Williams

• Re: RDF star and LPGs (Friday, 26 July)
• Re: RDF star and LPGs (Thursday, 25 July)
• RDF star and LPGs (Friday, 19 July)

James Anderson

• Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: RDF is a framework, not a vocabulary (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: RDF is a framework, not a vocabulary (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: new proposal (Wednesday, 3 July)

Kurt Cagle

• RDF-star WG biweekly meeting @ Thu, Jul 25, 2024 9:00am – 9:55am (GMT-07) (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Proposal by Kurt (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Proposal by Kurt (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: RDF is a framework, not a vocabulary (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: RDF is a framework, not a vocabulary (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: RDF is a framework, not a vocabulary (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: RDF is a framework, not a vocabulary (Friday, 12 July)

Niklas Lindström

• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms (Thursday, 25 July)
• LPG and RDF differences (Was Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms) (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Translating Property Graphs with Multiple Labels to RDF-sta (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: RDF star and LPGs (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: Proposal for RDF-star Minimal Baseline - Agenda item for this week's plenary (Wednesday, 17 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: RDF is a framework, not a vocabulary (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: RDF is a framework, not a vocabulary (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: RDF is a framework, not a vocabulary (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline] (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: Sem/UC TF meeting on Friday, 5.7.2024? (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: new proposal (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: new proposal (Tuesday, 2 July)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• triple terms are not a universal panacea (Thursday, 25 July)
• last call for use cases from the working group (with fixed link) (Thursday, 25 July)
• last call for use cases from the working group (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Proposal for RDF-star Minimal Baseline - Agenda item for this week's plenary (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: Proposal for RDF-star Minimal Baseline - Agenda item for this week's plenary (Thursday, 18 July)
• Re: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline] (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline] (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline] (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline] (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline] (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline] (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline] (Monday, 1 July)

Sasaki, Felix

• AW: Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting (Thursday, 25 July)
• AW: RDF star and LPGs (Monday, 22 July)
• AW: RDF star and LPGs (Monday, 22 July)
• AW: Event Invitation: RDF-star WG biweekly meeting (Thursday, 18 July)
• AW: Regrets for today's meeting (Thursday, 11 July)

Souripriya Das

• Re: [External] : Re: RDF star and LPGs (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: RDF star and LPGs (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: RDF star and LPGs (Sunday, 28 July)
• Re: [External] : Event Updated: RDF-star WG biweekly focused meeting (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: RDF is a framework, not a vocabulary (Friday, 12 July)
• RDF is a framework, not a vocabulary (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: new proposal (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: new proposal (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: new proposal (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: new proposal (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: new proposal (Tuesday, 2 July)
• new proposal (Monday, 1 July)

Thomas Lörtsch

• Re: Proposal by Kurt (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Re: Extending the baseline with "asserted" stuff - syntax & semantics (Wednesday, 31 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: RDF star and LPGs (Tuesday, 30 July)
• Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms (Friday, 26 July)
• Re: Proposal by Kurt (Friday, 26 July)
• Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: LPG and RDF differences (Was Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms) (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Proposal: described vs stated triple terms (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: Proposal by Kurt (Thursday, 25 July)
• Re: RDF star and LPGs (Thursday, 25 July)
• Proposal: described vs stated triple terms (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: Naming convention (Monday, 22 July)
• Re: RDF star and LPGs (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: RDF star and LPGs (Friday, 19 July)
• Re: [External] : Re: RDF is a framework, not a vocabulary (Saturday, 13 July)
• Re: RDF is a framework, not a vocabulary (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Thursday, 11 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: summary un/asserted (Tuesday, 9 July)
• summary un/asserted (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline] (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline] (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: Sem/UC TF meeting on Friday, 5.7.2024? (Thursday, 4 July)
• Sem/UC TF meeting on Friday, 5.7.2024? (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline] (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline] (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: Our approach to unasserted assertions is ambiguous and lossy [ was: Re: streamlining the baseline] (Monday, 1 July)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 July 2024 22:16:15 UTC