Naming convention

By looking at the syntax in the working baseline<https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/wiki/RDF-star-%22working-baseline%22>, we could adopt the following naming convention, which allows us to avoid the use of the words “asserted” and “unasserted”.

  *   a graph is a set of triples;
  *   therefore, when we refer to a triple then the triple is “asserted”;
  *   a triple term is not a triple;
  *   therefore, when we refer to a triple term then the triple term is “unasserted”;
  *   instead of saying that a triple term may be asserted, we should say that the triple structure of a triple term appears as a triple in the graph.

What do you think?
—e.