Saturday, 27 February 2010
Friday, 26 February 2010
Thursday, 25 February 2010
- Virtuoso 6.1 hits the streets!
- Re: BBC Wildlife Ontology and RDF
- Re: Linked Data API
- BBC Wildlife Ontology and RDF
- Re: Linked Data API
- Re: Linked Data API
- Re: Linked Data API
- Re: Linked Data API
- Re: Linked Data API
- Re: Linked Data API
- Re: AW: Linked Data API
- Re: AW: Linked Data API
- AW: Linked Data API
- Re: head/@profile needed in HTML 5? GRDDL in Linked Data community?
- Re: head/@profile needed in HTML 5? GRDDL in Linked Data community?
- Linked Data API
- RE: head/@profile needed in HTML 5? GRDDL in Linked Data community?
- Re: head/@profile needed in HTML 5? GRDDL in Linked Data community?
- Re: head/@profile needed in HTML 5? GRDDL in Linked Data community?
- Re: head/@profile needed in HTML 5? GRDDL in Linked Data community?
- TAC 2010 Knowledge Base Population track
- Re: head/@profile needed in HTML 5? GRDDL in Linked Data community?
- Re: Storing data with semantics..?
Wednesday, 24 February 2010
- Re: Storing data with semantics..?
- Re: Colors
- Re: head/@profile needed in HTML 5? GRDDL in Linked Data community?
- Storing data with semantics..?
- head/@profile needed in HTML 5? GRDDL in Linked Data community?
- Re: Colors
- Re: Colors
- Re: Colors
- Re: Colors
- Re: Colors
- Re: Colors
- Re: Colors
- Colors
- Re: ontology mapping etiquette (was What is the class of a Named Graph?)
Tuesday, 23 February 2010
- Extended Deadline: 5th Workshop on Semantic Wikis (SemWiki2010)
- Re: What is the class of a Named Graph?
- Re: ontology mapping etiquette (was What is the class of a Named Graph?)
- Call for papers: EISWT-10, Orlando, USA, July 2010
Monday, 22 February 2010
- Re: ontology mapping etiquette (was What is the class of a Named Graph?)
- ontology mapping etiquette (was What is the class of a Named Graph?)
- Re: Storing PKCS#12 inside FOAF profile for FOAF+SSL
- Re: [foaf-protocols] Storing PKCS#12 inside FOAF profile for FOAF+SSL
- Re: Storing PKCS#12 inside FOAF profile for FOAF+SSL
- Re: Storing PKCS#12 inside FOAF profile for FOAF+SSL
- [Fwd: Re: [foaf-protocols] Storing PKCS#12 inside FOAF profile for FOAF+SSL]
- Re: Storing PKCS#12 inside FOAF profile for FOAF+SSL
- Re: Storing PKCS#12 inside FOAF profile for FOAF+SSL
- Re: Storing PKCS#12 inside FOAF profile for FOAF+SSL
- Re: Storing PKCS#12 inside FOAF profile for FOAF+SSL
- Re: Storing PKCS#12 inside FOAF profile for FOAF+SSL
- Re: Storing PKCS#12 inside FOAF profile for FOAF+SSL
- Storing PKCS#12 inside FOAF profile for FOAF+SSL
- Re: What is the class of a Named Graph?
- Re: What is the class of a Named Graph?
- ESWC 2010 CFP: Linking of User Profiles and Applications in the Social Semantic Web (LUPAS)
- Re: What is the class of a Named Graph?
Sunday, 21 February 2010
- Reminder: Call for Papers - I-SEMANTICS 2010
- Re: What is the class of a Named Graph?
- Re: What is the class of a Named Graph?
- Re: What is the class of a Named Graph?
- Re: What is the class of a Named Graph?
- What is the class of a Named Graph?
Saturday, 20 February 2010
Friday, 19 February 2010
Thursday, 18 February 2010
- Re: Linking HTML pages and data
- Re: Request for "Good" Ontologies
- Re: Linking HTML pages and data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Linking HTML pages and data
Wednesday, 17 February 2010
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Contd: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Linking HTML pages and data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Linking HTML pages and data
- Re: Linking HTML pages and data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Linking HTML pages and data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Linking HTML pages and data
- Re: Linking HTML pages and data
- Re: Linking HTML pages and data
- Request for "Good" Ontologies
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Linking HTML pages and data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Linking HTML pages and data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Re: Terminology when talking about Linked Data
- Terminology when talking about Linked Data
Tuesday, 16 February 2010
- Re: Linking HTML pages and data
- Re: Linking HTML pages and data
- Re: Linking HTML pages and data
- Re: Linking HTML pages and data
- Entity Search Evaluation @ SEMSEARCH10
- Re: Linking HTML pages and data
- Re: Linking HTML pages and data
- Linking HTML pages and data
Monday, 15 February 2010
- Call for Papers: The Second Workshop on E-Learning Security (ELS-2010)
- 2nd CFP - 2nd International Workshop on Trust and Privacy on the Social and Semantic Web (SPOT 2010)
- 1st Workshop on the Semantics of Visual Objects (SEMVO2010) - Deadline extended to Mondary February 22, 2010
- Re: The status of Semantic Web community- perspective from Scopus and Web Of Science (WOS)
Sunday, 14 February 2010
- Re: Academic publishing and the Web [was Re: The status of Semantic Web community- perspective from Scopus and Web Of Science (WOS)]
- Re: Why are RDF containers (rdf:Seq etc.) so little appreciated?
- Re: Why are RDF containers (rdf:Seq etc.) so little appreciated?
- Re: Why are RDF containers (rdf:Seq etc.) so little appreciated?
- Re: The status of Semantic Web community- perspective from Scopus and Web Of Science (WOS)
- Re: Why are RDF containers (rdf:Seq etc.) so little appreciated?
- Draft paper submission deadline is extended: EISWT-10, Orlando, USA
Saturday, 13 February 2010
- Call for Papers: ICITST-2010!
- Call for Papers: ICITST-2010!
- Academic publishing and the Web [was Re: The status of Semantic Web community- perspective from Scopus and Web Of Science (WOS)]
- Re: The status of Semantic Web community- perspective from Scopus and Web Of Science (WOS)
- Re: The status of Semantic Web community- perspective from Scopus and Web Of Science (WOS)
- Re: The status of Semantic Web community- perspective from Scopus and Web Of Science (WOS)
- Re: The status of Semantic Web community- perspective from Scopus and Web Of Science (WOS)
- Re: The status of Semantic Web community- perspective from Scopus and Web Of Science (WOS)
- Re: The status of Semantic Web community- perspective from Scopus and Web Of Science (WOS)
- Why are RDF containers (rdf:Seq etc.) so little appreciated?
- Re: The status of Semantic Web community- perspective from Scopus and Web Of Science (WOS)
Friday, 12 February 2010
- Re: The status of Semantic Web community- perspective from Scopus and Web Of Science (WOS)
- The status of Semantic Web community- perspective from Scopus and Web Of Science (WOS)
- ANN: RedStore 0.1 - triplestore powered by Redland
- I-SEMANTICS 2010 and Pragmatic Web (ICPW 2010) - 2nd Call for Papers
- Deadline Extended: LDOW2010: 3rd International Workshop on Linked Data on the Web, at WWW2010, Raleigh, USA
- [CFP] SemSearch10 @ WWW
Thursday, 11 February 2010
- Reminder: Linked Data Meetup London, 24 February
- Re: GForge ontology ?
- Re: GForge ontology ?
- 2nd CfP: Ontology Repositories and Editors for the Semantic Web (ORES2010 @ ESWC)
- Re: Recommendations for serving backlinks when having hash URIs?
Wednesday, 10 February 2010
- Re: Recommendations for serving backlinks when having hash URIs?
- Re: Recommendations for serving backlinks when having hash URIs?
- Re: Recommendations for serving backlinks when having hash URIs?
- Re: Recommendations for serving backlinks when having hash URIs?
- Re: Recommendations for serving backlinks when having hash URIs?
- Re: Recommendations for serving backlinks when having hash URIs?
- GForge ontology ?
- Re: Recommendations for serving backlinks when having hash URIs?
- Re: Recommendations for serving backlinks when having hash URIs?
- Re: Recommendations for serving backlinks when having hash URIs?
- Semantic Web and Linked Data at SXSW
Tuesday, 9 February 2010
Monday, 8 February 2010
- Memento (Time Travel for the Web) Update
- ESWC 2010 2nd CfP: Workshop on Adaptation, Personalization and REcommendation in the Social-semantic Web (APRESW 2010)
- Re: [fresnel] Fresnel: State of the Art?
Sunday, 7 February 2010
Saturday, 6 February 2010
- Re: ‘New ontology pages’ as Semantic Web foundation
- ‘New ontology pages’ as Semantic Web foundation
- ‘New ontology pages’ as Semantic Web foundation
Friday, 5 February 2010
Thursday, 4 February 2010
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- EKAW 2010 – Call for Workshop Proposals
Tuesday, 2 February 2010
Thursday, 4 February 2010
- Re: [Virtuoso-users] Announcing Virtuoso Open-Source Edition v 6.1.0
- Re: [Virtuoso-users] Announcing Virtuoso Open-Source Edition v 6.1.0
- Announcing Virtuoso Open-Source Edition v 5.0.13
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Announcing Virtuoso Open-Source Edition v 6.1.0
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: New github project for RDFizer scripts
- Re: New github project for RDFizer scripts
Wednesday, 3 February 2010
- Re: [fresnel] Re: Fresnel: State of the Art?
- HPC-accelerated entity recognition
- [JOB] 2 Doctorate and 1 PostDoc position at AKSW / Uni Leipzig
- Re: [fresnel] Fresnel: State of the Art?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: foaf dataset
- 3rd CfP: LDOW2010 - 3rd International Workshop on Linked Data on the Web, at WWW2010, Raleigh, USA
- Re: [fresnel] Fresnel: State of the Art?
- foaf dataset
- Re: Conferences about Semantics
Tuesday, 2 February 2010
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: Conferences about Semantics
- Re: Conferences about Semantics
- Re: Conferences about Semantics
- Re: [fresnel] Fresnel: State of the Art?
- Re: Conferences about Semantics
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Conferences about Semantics
- CFP, Ontology Repositories and Editors for the Semantic Web
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- RE: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: [fresnel] Re: Fresnel: State of the Art?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: Fresnel: State of the Art?
- Re: DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- DBpedia-based entity recognition service / tool?
- Re: Fresnel: State of the Art?
Monday, 1 February 2010
- Re: Enterprise level RDF Scripting ( was: [foaf-protocols] foaf classes for primary Topic )
- Re: Fresnel: State of the Art?
- Re: Fresnel: State of the Art?
- Re: [fresnel] Fresnel: State of the Art?
- Enterprise level RDF Scripting ( was: [foaf-protocols] foaf classes for primary Topic )
- Fresnel: State of the Art?
- Re: [foaf-protocols] foaf classes for primary Topic
- Re: [foaf-protocols] foaf classes for primary Topic