- From: Damian Steer <d.steer@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:03:34 +0000
- To: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
On 16/02/10 12:39, Sean Bechhofer wrote: > > LODders > > A simple (possibly dumb) question. Is there a standard mechanism for > linking an HTML page to the non-information resource that it describes? > In contrast, if I look at the page for the band on the BBC, i.e. > > <http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/d700b3f5-45af-4d02-95ed-57d301bda93e> > > there seems to be no reference at all to the non-information resource > > <http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/d700b3f5-45af-4d02-95ed-57d301bda93e#artist> > > > which is the "subject" of the page. In this case you have: html:rel alternate -> rdf version of page (you can also ask for rdf/xml directly in accept header). RDF version says primary topic is '...#artist' So perhaps the BBC perspective is that the HTML is a lower-fidelity representation of the resource. The dbpedia page also has a rel alternate to an rdf version. In that case, however, the page isn't mentioned. I would add a little RDFa (to beef up the fidelity a touch) and use foaf:primaryTopic. Damian
Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2010 14:02:38 UTC