- From: Herbert Van de Sompel <hvdsomp@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:14:01 -0700
- To: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <28EBDF17-9217-4B72-940B-F5D633398AF8@gmail.com>
Dear all, A while ago, there was an interesting discussion on this list regarding the Memento proposal. The discussion is probably best summarized by referencing Pete Johnston's blog entry: http://efoundations.typepad.com/efoundations/2009/11/memento-and-negotiating-on-time.html Following feedback from that discussion, and invaluable input received at a recent meeting with representatives from major web archives (see http://www.mementoweb.org/events/IA201002/) , we have made some revisions/rationalizations to the proposed framework. The updated perspective is summarized in the slide deck at: http://www.slideshare.net/hvdsomp/memento-updated-technical-details-february-2010 The major changes are: (*) Use of a HTTP Link header instead of a HTTP 302 redirect to allow navigation from an Original Resource to a TimeGate for it. This solves a caching issue faced by the initial approach, and also allows applying the framework to non-information resources in order to allow retrieving their prior descriptions (see the final slides of the aforementioned slide deck). (*) Use of the same architecture (distinct Original Resource, TimeGate, Memento) for scenarios that involve Web archives and Content Management Systems as servers of Mementos. Greetings Herbert Van de Sompel == Herbert Van de Sompel Digital Library Research & Prototyping Los Alamos National Laboratory, Research Library http://public.lanl.gov/herbertv/ tel. +1 505 667 1267
Received on Monday, 8 February 2010 21:14:43 UTC