- From: Ian Davis <lists@iandavis.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:58:26 +0000
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>, public-lod@w3.org
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > I really don't believe we achieve much via: > <link rel="primarytopic" > href="http://education.data.gov.uk/id/school/500006" /> > > "primarytopic" isn't an IANA registered type link. Yes, I know. Nor is foaf:primaytopic :) I think there's a good chance of getting wide adoption for rel="primarytopic" as a pattern / microformat / whatever. Having that very simple relation would be a massive boost for cross-linking the document web with the data web, important enough to warrant a special case IMHO. > > If you absolutely need to use foaf then its better to qualify it: > <link rel="foaf:primarytopic" > href="http://education.data.gov.uk/id/school/500006" /> > > Yes, its a PITA for the average HTML user/developer, but being superficially > simpler doesn't make it a valid long term solution. There is a standard in > place for custom typed links re. <link/>. The two are not exclusive. In an RDFa environment, I would suggest using foaf:primaryTopic (note case too - too easy for developers to mis-type) Ian
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 09:58:56 UTC