- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:55:33 -0600
- To: semantic-web@w3.org, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
The proposal from the editors and chairs it that it is not needed; i.e. not cost-effective. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0794.html Dan B., your message suggests (without actually saying so) that Dublin Core doesn't need it. Have you heard back from the Dublin Core decision-making authorities? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jan/0576.html The microformats community seems happy to explore alternatives. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0690.html I'm considering pushing back on the 0794 proposal, but it's only worth my time if somebody actually needs head/@profile to survive into HTML 5. Does anybody need it? On a somewhat related topic... as RDFa matures, the need for GRDDL somewhat fades. I wonder, though... to what extent is GRDDL used in the linked data community? What tools consume it? What content providers produce it? See also: The details of data in documents: GRDDL, profiles, and HTML5 By Dan Connolly in HTML, Semantic Web, Web Architecture, XML on August 22, 2008 7:45 PM http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/08/the_details_of_data_in_documen.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 16:55:42 UTC