- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:35:31 -0500
- To: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
Ed Summers wrote: > Hi Sean, > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Sean Bechhofer > <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > >> A simple (possibly dumb) question. Is there a standard mechanism for linking >> an HTML page to the non-information resource that it describes? >> > > Not a dumb question at all--at least for me :-) > > I've been using the <link> pattern that Chris Bizer, Richard Cyganiak > and Tom Heath documented in How To Publish Linked Data On The Web [1] > for discovery of RDF documents that are related to a given HTML > document. > > But you are asking about the relation between a document and the the > *thing* being described. I agree with Damien that foaf:primaryTopic > seems like it could work, and that one possibility would be to slip a > bit of RDFa into the HTML document that asserted: > > <> foaf:primaryTopic <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mogwai_(band)> . > I agree with Damien too, I've nagged enough people about their RDF docs lacking the relation above :-) Ironically, we left the relation out of the RDF docs we generate for DBpedia due to some legacy re-write rules :-( > I also agree w/ Kingsley that it would be neat to also have a <link> > pattern that non-RDFa folks could use: > > <link rel="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopic" > href="http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mogwai_(band)" title="Mogwai" /> > > Or if mnot's Web Linking RFC is approved it would open the door to > using the Link HTTP Header: > > Link: <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mogwai_(band)>; > rel="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopic"; title="Mogwai" > We assumed this is a go, and already showcase it via URIBurner and DBpedia data space URIs. > Registering [3] primaryTopic as a link relation type would tighten it > up a bit, as well as help advertise the pattern. > > <link rel="primaryTopic" > href="http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mogwai_(band)" title="Mogwai" /> > Yes, but right now rel="foaf:pimarytopic" is fine as a custom relation. Conversely, "describedby" or "wrt:describedby" is emerging as a cool mechanism for connecting an Entity (via its generic HTTP URI) to the Resource that holds its description. > At any rate, I'd be interested to hear if other people have other > approaches to this. It would be nice to have a little recipe (w3c > note?) people could follow when making these sorts of assertions on > the web. Assuming one isn't there already of course :-) > We need to make a definitive note about Linked Data auto-discovery patterns, its way overdue. Kingsley > //Ed > > PS. the oai-ore folks had a similar use case to link descriptions to > the thing being described. They ended up creating a new term > oai:describes [4], and documented ways of layering assertions into rdf > [5], atom [6] and html [7] documents. I think the vocabulary is > probably too specific to aggregations and resource maps to be useful > in the general case you are talking about though. > > PSS. I really just wanted to type Mogwai a bunch of times :-) > > [1] http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/pub/LinkedDataTutorial/#discovery > [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07 > [3] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07#section-6.2 > [4] http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/vocabulary#ore-describes > [5] http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/rdfxml#remtoaggr > [6] http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/atom#metadata > [7] http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/discovery#HTMLLinkElement > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Tuesday, 16 February 2010 20:36:01 UTC