- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 10:29:48 +0000
- To: Jiří Procházka <ojirio@gmail.com>, Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- CC: <nathan@webr3.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
> What you pointed at is a property sd:namedGraph. Well spotted! But I didn't really say: here is the class name. I wanted to point out that there is something relevant, likely be part of an upcoming standard so one should have it in mind. Sorry for not being explicit enough in the first place ;) > The upcoming SPARQLstandard doesn't define any class for named graphs. Not yet. Any news from this end, Greg? Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html > From: Jiří Procházka <ojirio@gmail.com> > Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 10:51:16 +0100 > To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> > Cc: <nathan@webr3.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org> > Subject: Re: What is the class of a Named Graph? > > What you pointed at is a property sd:namedGraph. The upcoming SPARQL > standard doesn't define any class for named graphs. > I support using: http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/rdfg-1/Graph > > Best, > Jiri > > On 02/21/2010 10:40 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote: >> >> Nathan, >> >>> Any further input before I start using rdfg-1:Graph when describing graphs? >> >> I'd suggest you forget about both references and go with the upcoming >> SPARQL standard [1]. >> >> Cheers, >> Michael >> >> [1] >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-service-description-20100126/#id41744 >> >
Received on Sunday, 21 February 2010 10:30:22 UTC