- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:01:04 +0100
- To: Mike Bergman <mike@mkbergman.com>
- Cc: nathan@webr3.org, Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
PS. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html On 17 February 2010 12:00, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> wrote: > For a definition of Linked Data I'd suggest anything that conforms to > timbl's Linked Data expectations: > > 1. Use URIs as names for things > 2. Use HTTP URIs so that people can look up those names. > 3. When someone looks up a URI, provide useful information, using > the standards (RDF, SPARQL) > 4. Include links to other URIs. so that they can discover more things. > > While Tim only lists RDF & SPARQL as the standards, pragmatically I > reckon there's a bit of leeway here, e.g. a HTML document or Atom feed > is likely to contain links and data that can be interpreted as RDF - > in fact *any* hyperlink could be seen as an RDF statement (maybe > <docA> dc:relation <docB>), so depending on the context a looser > definition of linked data as "linky stuff" doesn't seem unreasonable. > > Cheers, > Danny. > > -- > http://danny.ayers.name > -- http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 11:01:38 UTC