- From: Matthias Samwald <samwald@gmx.at>
- Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 17:37:39 +0100
- To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@danbri.org>, "Georgi Kobilarov" <georgi.kobilarov@gmx.de>
- Cc: <public-lod@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2010 16:38:12 UTC
Danbri wrote: > One idea I had on NoTube that is implemented experimentally in > http://lupedia.ontotext.com/ is to use RDFa as an interop point. So > one of the interfaces from the Ontotext demo there is to return RDFa > markup - http://lupedia.ontotext.com/test-page4rdfa.html I had a similar idea when I created a text annotation service for the biomedical domain. For example: http://whatizit.neurocommons.org/index.py/pmid?pipeline=whatizitEBIMedDiseaseChemicals&query=17477962&format=atag (can be quite slow to respond) This contains recognized entities embedded via RDFa. In this case, each sentence is represented as a sioc:Item and the entities within the sentence are represented as sioc:topics of the sentence. The RDF of the example above looks like this: http://tinyurl.com/ydayqr3 However, the entities are taken from ontologies in the Open Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) collection, and not DBpedia. Entity recognition is based on another bioinformatics server, and I cannot just add DBpedia as a vocabulary. > however > this doesn't leave much scope for including confidence measures etc in > the output. Why? You could include it as RDFa markup around pieces of the text that are not visible in the browser? Cheers, Matthias Samwald
Received on Tuesday, 2 February 2010 16:38:12 UTC