public-wsc-wg@w3.org from March 2008 by author

Anil Saldhana

• Re: ISSUE-188 (props): xit needs an acknowlegements section [wsc-xit] (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-03-26 (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: ISSUE-188 (props): xit needs an acknowlegements section [wsc-xit] (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: ISSUE-188 (props): xit needs an acknowlegements section [wsc-xit] (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-03-05 (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: URL disambiguation (Tuesday, 4 March)
• ACTION-371: Stab at ISSUE-124 (Tuesday, 4 March)

Close, Tyler J.

• petnames and bookmarks (Was: petname implementation recommendation proposal) (Thursday, 20 March)
• RE: petname implementation recommendation proposal (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: petname implementation recommendation proposal (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: petname implementation recommendation proposal (Wednesday, 19 March)
• petname implementation recommendation proposal (Friday, 14 March)
• RE: ISSUE-186 (Petname option): Give petname as an option in identity signal [wsc-xit] (Friday, 14 March)
• RE: meta-topic on a tool produced while editing for this WG (Friday, 7 March)
• RE: meta-topic on a tool produced while editing for this WG (Friday, 7 March)
• meta-topic on a tool produced while editing for this WG (Friday, 7 March)
• RE: Should EV signalling be in place if the user granted an exception? (Thursday, 6 March)
• RE: ACTION-401: Larry as Lo-Fi prototype for 6.1.1 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• petname definition for ACTION-391 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• RE: ACTION-386: Use TLS for Login Pages (Tuesday, 4 March)
• RE: ACTION-371: Stab at ISSUE-124 (Tuesday, 4 March)

Dan Schutzer

• RE: ACTION-406: Petname burden (Friday, 28 March)
• RE: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-03-26 (Tuesday, 25 March)
• RE: petname implementation recommendation proposal (Wednesday, 19 March)
• RE: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-03-05 (Tuesday, 4 March)

Hal Lockhart

• RE: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-03-05 (Wednesday, 5 March)
• RE: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-03-05 (Wednesday, 5 March)

Hallam-Baker, Phillip

• RE: Some studies on the visibility of EV sites. (Friday, 7 March)
• RE: Some studies on the visibility of EV sites. (Thursday, 6 March)
• RE: Some studies on the visibility of EV sites. (Thursday, 6 March)
• RE: Some studies on the visibility of EV sites. (Wednesday, 5 March)
• RE: Some studies on the visibility of EV sites. (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Some studies on the visibility of EV sites. (Wednesday, 5 March)

Ian Fette

• Re: "reputation"? Re: Some major edits just checked in. (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ISSUE-116 ReconfigureChrome Should users be able to reconfigure primary chrome? (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Authoring practices on mixed content and unsafe redirects. (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ISSUE-112 Conformance models for usability? (Friday, 28 March)
• ACTION-406: Petname burden (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: ISSUE-186 (Petname option): Give petname as an option in identity signal [wsc-xit] (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: ISSUE-186 (Petname option): Give petname as an option in identity signal [wsc-xit] (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-03-05 (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: URL disambiguation (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: URL disambiguation (Tuesday, 4 March)
• ACTION-399 (Monday, 3 March)
• Re: ACTION-386: Use TLS for Login Pages (Monday, 3 March)

Jan Vidar Krey

• Re: Agenda: WSC WG weekly 2008-03-19 (Wednesday, 19 March)

Johnathan Nightingale

• Re: Authoring practices on mixed content and unsafe redirects. (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Secure chrome (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: ACTION-409: Revise "MUST include applicable DNS name" based on discussion (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-03-26 (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: ISSUE-188 (props): xit needs an acknowlegements section [wsc-xit] (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: ACTION-405: Clarify material on crossing the content-chrome boundary (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Logotypes in identity signal and additional context information sections (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Logotypes in identity signal and additional context information sections (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Agenda: WSC WG weekly 2008-03-19 (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: ISSUE-188 (props): xit needs an acknowlegements section [wsc-xit] (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: Single site browsers (Thursday, 13 March)
• Re: ISSUE-186 (Petname option): Give petname as an option in identity signal [wsc-xit] (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: Should EV signalling be in place if the user granted an exception? (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: Should EV signalling be in place if the user granted an exception? (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: ACTION-401: Larry as Lo-Fi prototype for 6.1.1 (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: ACTION-399 (Monday, 3 March)

Maritza Johnson

• Re: ACTION-345 OPEN Begin designing lo-fi user study for Browser Lockdown Maritza Johnson 2008-02-28 (Tuesday, 25 March)

Mary Ellen Zurko

• 6.4 and accessibility (Friday, 28 March)
• ISSUE-133 Plugin Problems How do our definition of Web Page and the Robustiness section interact? (Friday, 28 March)
• ISSUE-128 Strong / weak algorithms? (Friday, 28 March)
• ISSUE-118 Interaction glossary? (Friday, 28 March)
• ISSUE-116 ReconfigureChrome Should users be able to reconfigure primary chrome? (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ISSUE-112 Conformance models for usability? (Friday, 28 March)
• ISSUE-112 Conformance models for usability? (Friday, 28 March)
• ISSUE-110 POST triggered via JavaScript (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Authoring practices on mixed content and unsafe redirects. (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: audio logotypes (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Authoring practices on mixed content and unsafe redirects. (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Authoring practices on mixed content and unsafe redirects. (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: audio logotypes (Friday, 28 March)
• "reputation"? Re: Some major edits just checked in. (Friday, 28 March)
• Conformance model in section 7 (Re: New editor's draft shuffles sections.) (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: New editor's draft shuffles sections. (Friday, 28 March)
• WSC Open Action Items (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ACTION-406: Petname burden (Friday, 28 March)
• ISSUE-137 - Require Identity Signal whenever URLs are displayed (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Some major edits just checked in. - tls errors (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Some major edits just checked in. - SSC (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Some major edits just checked in. - SSC (Friday, 28 March)
• low cost UT on some aspect of LC June (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-03-26 (Tuesday, 25 March)
• ISSUE-104 Some information in certificates is not trustworthy (Friday, 21 March)
• ISSUE-41 limited guidance on presentation OK (public comment) (Friday, 21 March)
• ISSUE-4 How applicable is baseline information to content retrieved by FTP? (Friday, 21 March)
• Can XQuery/XPath contribute to attack vectors? (Friday, 21 March)
• WSC Open Action Items (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: ACTION-345 OPEN Begin designing lo-fi user study for Browser Lockdown Maritza Johnson 2008-02-28 (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: ISSUE-189 (SharedSecretWithWhom): shared secret from UA of web site? [wsc-xit] (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: ISSUE-189 (SharedSecretWithWhom): shared secret from UA of web site? [wsc-xit] (Thursday, 20 March)
• process topics (re: petname implementation recommendation proposal) (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: ISSUE-188 (props): xit needs an acknowlegements section [wsc-xit] (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: consistency observation re absence of trustworthy information (Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June) (Friday, 14 March)
• Re: ISSUE-187 (PinnedCerts): Be clear on just what pinned certificates are and are not [wsc-xit] (Friday, 14 March)
• RE: Some studies on the visibility of EV sites. (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: Nomenclature fixes around self-signed certificates (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: ISSUE-182: We have lost the "secure page" definition [wsc-xit] (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: Nomenclature fixes around self-signed certificates (Friday, 7 March)
• Discussion of 6.1 for LC June (Friday, 7 March)
• Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-03-05 (Tuesday, 4 March)

michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com

• New secure browser developed (Friday, 28 March)
• RE: ISSUE-133 Plugin Problems How do our definition of Web Page and the Robustiness section interact? (Friday, 28 March)
• Secure chrome (Wednesday, 26 March)
• RE: ISSUE-188 (props): xit needs an acknowlegements section [wsc-xit] (Friday, 14 March)
• RE: consistency observation re absence of trustworthy information (Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June) (Friday, 14 March)
• RE: Single site browsers (Thursday, 13 March)
• Single site browsers (Thursday, 13 March)
• RE: URL disambiguation (Tuesday, 4 March)
• RE: URL disambiguation (Tuesday, 4 March)
• RE: URL disambiguation (Tuesday, 4 March)
• RE: URL disambiguation (Tuesday, 4 March)
• RE: URL disambiguation (Tuesday, 4 March)
• USB smart buttons (Tuesday, 4 March)
• URL disambiguation (Tuesday, 4 March)

Mike Beltzner

• Re: Some studies on the visibility of EV sites. (Wednesday, 5 March)

Rachna Dhamija

• Re: petname implementation recommendation proposal (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: petname implementation recommendation proposal (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Some studies on the visibility of EV sites. (Sunday, 9 March)

Roger Lang

• Re: Summary of FSTC Security Meeting (Thursday, 20 March)
• Summary of FSTC Security Meeting (Thursday, 13 March)
• Reminder to dial in - Monthly FSTC Security SCOM Speakers for March 13th, 1pm - 2pm: 512-225-3050, pc 803903#] (Friday, 7 March)

Serge Egelman

• RE: ISSUE-188 (props): xit needs an acknowlegements section [wsc-xit] (Monday, 24 March)
• RE: ISSUE-188 (props): xit needs an acknowlegements section [wsc-xit] (Monday, 24 March)
• Re: petname implementation recommendation proposal (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Some studies on the visibility of EV sites. (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: Some studies on the visibility of EV sites. (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-03-05 (Wednesday, 5 March)

Stephen Farrell

• Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: ISSUE-188 (props): xit needs an acknowlegements section [wsc-xit] (Saturday, 22 March)
• Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June (Friday, 21 March)
• Re: petname implementation recommendation proposal (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: petname implementation recommendation proposal (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: URL disambiguation (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: URL disambiguation (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: URL disambiguation (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: URL disambiguation (Tuesday, 4 March)

Thomas Roessler

• Re: ISSUE-116 ReconfigureChrome Should users be able to reconfigure primary chrome? (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: audio logotypes (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: "reputation"? Re: Some major edits just checked in. (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Authoring practices on mixed content and unsafe redirects. (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: audio logotypes (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: New editor's draft shuffles sections. (Friday, 28 March)
• Meeting record: 2008-03-19 (Friday, 28 March)
• audio logotypes (Friday, 28 March)
• Authoring practices on mixed content and unsafe redirects. (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ISSUE-137 - Require Identity Signal whenever URLs are displayed (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Some major edits just checked in. - tls errors (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Some major edits just checked in. - SSC (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Some major edits just checked in. - SSC (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: ACTION-405: Clarify material on crossing the content-chrome boundary (Friday, 28 March)
• Some major edits just checked in. (Wednesday, 26 March)
• ACTION-409: Revise "MUST include applicable DNS name" based on discussion (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: petnames and bookmarks (Was: petname implementation recommendation proposal) (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: ACTION-406: Petname burden (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: petnames and bookmarks (Was: petname implementation recommendation proposal) (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Not yet a proposal: error conditions (ACTION-390) (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-03-26 (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-03-26 (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: ISSUE-188 (props): xit needs an acknowlegements section [wsc-xit] (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: ACTION-355: Describe algorithms commonly used to create display names of certificates (Saturday, 22 March)
• Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June (Friday, 21 March)
• ACTION-405: Clarify material on crossing the content-chrome boundary (Thursday, 20 March)
• Re: Logotypes in identity signal and additional context information sections (Thursday, 20 March)
• Additional Security Context Information: "why trusted?" (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: ISSUE-141: More history that may be part of additional security context information [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Logotypes in identity signal and additional context information sections (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: ACTION-399 (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Meeting record: WSC WG weekly 2008-03-05 (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: New editor's draft shuffles sections. (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Agenda: WSC WG weekly 2008-03-19 (Tuesday, 18 March)
• New editor's draft shuffles sections. (Tuesday, 18 March)
• Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June (Friday, 14 March)
• ACTION-393: Rerwite trust indicators in content text. (Friday, 14 March)
• wsc-usecases published as Note (Saturday, 8 March)
• Re: ISSUE-186 (Petname option): Give petname as an option in identity signal [wsc-xit] (Saturday, 8 March)
• Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June (Saturday, 8 March)
• consistency observation re absence of trustworthy information (Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June) (Saturday, 8 March)
• Re: ISSUE-187 (PinnedCerts): Be clear on just what pinned certificates are and are not [wsc-xit] (Saturday, 8 March)
• Re: meta-topic on a tool produced while editing for this WG (Saturday, 8 March)
• Re: meta-topic on a tool produced while editing for this WG (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: meta-topic on a tool produced while editing for this WG (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: ISSUE-187 (PinnedCerts): Be clear on just what pinned certificates are and are not [wsc-xit] (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: ISSUE-186 (Petname option): Give petname as an option in identity signal [wsc-xit] (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: ISSUE-186 (Petname option): Give petname as an option in identity signal [wsc-xit] (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: ISSUE-182: We have lost the "secure page" definition [wsc-xit] (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: Nomenclature fixes around self-signed certificates (Friday, 7 March)
• Nomenclature fixes around self-signed certificates (Friday, 7 March)
• Re: Should EV signalling be in place if the user granted an exception? (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: Should EV signalling be in place if the user granted an exception? (Thursday, 6 March)
• Re: Should EV signalling be in place if the user granted an exception? (Thursday, 6 March)
• Should EV signalling be in place if the user granted an exception? (Thursday, 6 March)
• Meeting record: WSC WG weekly 2008-02-27 (Wednesday, 5 March)
• Re: ISSUE-182: We have lost the "secure page" definition [wsc-xit] (Tuesday, 4 March)
• Re: ACTION-399 (Tuesday, 4 March)
• ACTION-388: Rewrite Self-Signed Certificate Material (Tuesday, 4 March)

Timothy Hahn

• Re: ACTION-406: Petname burden (Wednesday, 26 March)
• Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-03-26 (Tuesday, 25 March)
• Re: petnames and bookmarks (Was: petname implementation recommendation proposal) (Friday, 21 March)
• RE: petname implementation recommendation proposal (Friday, 21 March)
• RE: petname implementation recommendation proposal (Wednesday, 19 March)
• Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2008-03-05 (Tuesday, 4 March)

Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-189 (SharedSecretWithWhom): shared secret from UA of web site? [wsc-xit] (Wednesday, 19 March)
• ISSUE-188 (props): xit needs an acknowlegements section [wsc-xit] (Friday, 14 March)
• ISSUE-187 (PinnedCerts): Be clear on just what pinned certificates are and are not [wsc-xit] (Friday, 7 March)
• ISSUE-186 (Petname option): Give petname as an option in identity signal [wsc-xit] (Friday, 7 March)

Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen

• Re: Authoring practices on mixed content and unsafe redirects. (Friday, 28 March)
• Re: Should EV signalling be in place if the user granted an exception? (Thursday, 6 March)

Last message date: Friday, 28 March 2008 23:27:21 UTC