- From: Johnathan Nightingale <johnath@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:27:26 -0400
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
+1 - though Ian may or may not want to take (separate?) issue with the details of how a DNS name is extracted, in this case. Cheers, J On 26-Mar-08, at 1:20 PM, Thomas Roessler wrote: > > Based on today's discussion, I'd suggest to change that bullet point > into the following: > > <item><p>If the identity signal does not include any other > human readable information about the identity of the > certificate subect (derived, e.g., from an augmented assurance > certificate <phrase role="sqbrackets">or a petname</phrase>), > then > it MUST include an applicable DNS name retrieved from the > subject's Common Name attribute or from a subjectAltName > extension.</p></item> > > http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/rec/rewrite.html#signal-content > > Regards, > -- > Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> > --- Johnathan Nightingale Human Shield johnath@mozilla.com
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:28:16 UTC