W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > March 2008

Re: Discussion of 6.1 for LC June

From: Johnathan Nightingale <johnath@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:32:28 -0400
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "Yngve N. Pettersen" <yngve@opera.com>, public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <106B1C52-D590-42B7-957F-4F670CD5C560@mozilla.com>
To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>


On 26-Mar-08, at 7:52 AM, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Yngve, Johnath, would you have any input what your current
> implementations do with (a) wildcards in CNs in terms of matching,
> and (b) how they are distinguished from human-readable CNs for the
> purpose of deriving whatever string can be shown to people.

The current AA certs out there (EV certs) don't allow wildcard  
matching, but in any case, EV certs also require, full stop, a valid O  
field, so we don't walk the rest of the cert for that value.  If a CA  
is issuing EV certs without valid (and validated!) O fields, they  
should fail their audits.  :)

Cheers,

J

---
Johnathan Nightingale
Human Shield
johnath@mozilla.com
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2008 13:33:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 26 March 2008 13:33:12 GMT