- From: Johnathan Nightingale <johnath@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:39:02 -0400
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
On 20-Mar-08, at 10:33 AM, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 2008-03-20 09:54:41 -0400, Johnathan Nightingale wrote: > >> Am I misinterpreting? > > Yes. Read the text before the bullet points. ;-) > > If that's still not clear, maybe "rendered" needs to be replaced by > "chosen" in the bullet points. You may imagine me to be blushing appropriately sheepishly. Never mind! :) Cheers, J > > >> Where this specification suggests or mandates the rendering of >> (either audio or visual) logotypes, the logotype is chosen as >> follows: >> >> * When the logotype information is derived from an augmented >> assurance certificate, then the subject logotype MUST be >> rendered, if present. >> >> * Otherwise, when the logotype information is derived from a >> validated certificate, then the issuer logotype MUST be >> rendered, if present. >> >> Note that an augmented assurance certificate that does not include a >> subject logo will cause the issuer logotype, if present, to be >> rendered. > > -- > Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> --- Johnathan Nightingale Human Shield johnath@mozilla.com
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2008 14:39:48 UTC