Re: Some major edits just checked in. - SSC

fine with me

On 2008-03-28 09:17:48 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:
> From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
> To: "Thomas Roessler <tlr" <tlr@w3.org>
> Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:17:48 -0400
> Subject: Re: Some major edits just checked in. - SSC
> List-Id: <public-wsc-wg.w3.org>
> X-Spam-Level: 
> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
> 	public-wsc-wg-request@listhub.w3.org designates 128.30.52.56 as permitted sender)
> 	smtp.mail=public-wsc-wg-request@listhub.w3.org
> Archived-At:
> 	<http://www.w3.org/mid/OF85008058.52AF164A-ON8525741A.0048F58B-8525741A.00490AA2@LocalDo
> 	main>
> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.238650, version=1.1.6
> 
> > > Or just "the same root every time for this cert"? 
> > 
> > yes
> 
> OK, I'd suggest this tweak for clarification:
> 
> "If a Web site consistently presents the same self-signed
> certificate (or the same certificate chaining up to the same untrusted
> root) to a client, "
> 
> 

-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>

Received on Friday, 28 March 2008 13:38:40 UTC